• @JASN_DE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1302 months ago

    Reporting is done by users who voluntarily upload their system specs via
    # hw-probe -all -upload

    So not skewed at all

    • @KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      60
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Do you have a better way of measuring it?
      In what direction would voluntary self-reporting of all system specs skew the display server statistic (and why)?

      • @atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1062 months ago

        Do you have a better way of measuring it?

        No better way of measuring doesn’t mean this is a good way of measuring.

          • @atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            482 months ago

            A method that attempts to collect data from a randomized or representative population rather than relying on self-report.

            • Fushuan [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              222 months ago

              The fact that you need consent to get this data would make a randomized approach impossible.

                • @conorab@lemmy.conorab.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  122 months ago

                  Steam hardware survey but that will skew towards gamers. That said, it would be a good indicator on how compatible Wayland is.

                  • @crater2150@feddit.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    82 months ago

                    The Steam hardware survey will skew towards whatever it is the Steamdeck uses in the surveyed categories.

                • @umbrella@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 month ago

                  canonical has been doing this for years too, and a significant portion of linux users are on ubuntu. i’m not sure if a good portion of users enable it though.

            • andrew
              link
              fedilink
              English
              42 months ago

              Yeah, this is pretty textbook selection bias.

            • @refalo@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              72 months ago

              Well do you want useful stats or not /s

              But seriously, a lot of opt-in (that never get opted in to) data is insanely useful for developers, but it has such a bad stigma that we never get anywhere close to the amount of usefulness a larger dataset could provide.

            • @SuperIce@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              52 months ago

              I like the way kde does it. On first install it gives a slider with how much analytics you want to send. I just do all of it because I trust KDE, but it’s nice that it asks you. They probably have some pretty good data.

              • Tlaloc_Temporal
                link
                fedilink
                12 months ago

                This is the important point IMHO. This kind of feedback is exactly something I’d love to do, but I don’t think I had any idea about it before this post. Just a little popup on a new install/upgrade would be a much broader net.

      • Dandroid
        link
        fedilink
        29
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I imagine people who care about this sort of thing are more likely to report it. And people who care about this sort of thing are also more likely to be early adopters and go through the effort of switching to Wayland.

        The way to get a more random sample is not something I want (built-in, automatic telemetry by default). So I’m fine with having skewed data for something like this.

    • @Vilian@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      42 months ago

      err, why? actually it can be skewed against wayland(wayland users tend to be more security aware), and why the suprise, KDE, GNOME are wayland from the get go, steam deck too, hyprland and sway etc

      • @atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        312 months ago

        It can skew either way equally. We’re just left to do armchair psychology about the type of people who would submit data to this site. So the numbers are effectively useless.

        • @iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          52 months ago

          But the change in the numbers is not useless since the psychology of the Wayland users vs. x11 didn’t change

          • @atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 months ago

            That seems probable but was there any doubt that Wayland use is increasing? Wayland has been changing to the default distro by distro. The only reason this is “news” is because somebody has claimed that “Wayland usage has overtaken X11”.

        • ddh
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 months ago

          You’re discounting the trend here. Assuming the methodology is consistent, over a short time we’re seeing a noticeable change, bias or not.

          • @atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            52 months ago

            I’m not actually. Does anybody doubt that wayland use is increasing? Distros have increasingly been making it the default. I’d be surprised if use weren’t increasing. In fact it might be under-represented in this data depending on whether all distros are being accurately represented or not.

    • @drathvedro@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      11 month ago

      I just did that, why not, but it misreported my DE anyway, so I’d take the OP post with quite a grain of salt.

      • @refalo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        14
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Because a huge portion of the people willing to do this are already on Wayland, but I believe there exists an even larger percentage on X that are not submitting any data.

        And another commenter said:

        We’re just left to do armchair psychology about the type of people who would submit data to this site. So the numbers are effectively useless.

        • @onlinepersona@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -32 months ago

          Because a huge portion of the people willing to do this are already on Wayland, but I believe there exists an even larger percentage on X that are not submitting any data.

          What is the basis for that assumption?

          And another commenter said:

          We’re just left to do armchair psychology about the type of people who would submit data to this site. So the numbers are effectively useless.

          So because one cannot know which type of people submit data to the site it should be disregarded? That’s basically saying any poll or questionnaire with anonymous yet unique answers are invalid. That’s a pretty bad argument.

          Anti Commercial-AI license

          • @atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            9
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            So because one cannot know which type of people submit data to the site it should be disregarded? That’s basically saying any poll or questionnaire with anonymous yet unique answers are invalid. That’s a pretty bad argument.

            This is basically a survey or poll. You want people to provide you with data about what they’re running. To get an accurate view of the entire population you need a representative and randomized sample. If you’re relying entirely on self-reported data you’re not going to be getting a reliably randomized subset of people. You’ll get people who are motivated to report their usage to a third party. That can lead to persistent biases in the data.

            It may be that Wayland use is being under represented because the people reporting want to show that “X11 is still king!” Or it could be that this website is shared frequently with certain user groups (e.g. in some arch (btw) forum or something) and so you’re getting a skew towards that population and away from the whole.

            We don’t know who these users are and we can’t “offset” for those factors. And the data isn’t reliably randomized so it’s subject to those biases whether we know about them or not.

            Though as another person pointed out the trend itself may be of some interest if the population being polled is consistent. Though I doubt anybody suspected that Wayland use is NOT increasing?

      • @chayleaf@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        11 month ago

        by default, your content is all rights reserved, the most restrictive license possible. AI trains on “all rights reserved” content all the time. You really think adding a CC-BY-NC is gonna do anything?