State Farm will discontinue coverage for 72,000 houses and apartments in California starting this summer, the insurance giant said this week, nine months after announcing it would not issue new home policies in the state

The Illinois-based company, California’s largest insurer, cited soaring costs, the increasing risk of catastrophes like wildfires and outdated regulations as reasons it won’t renew the policies on 30,000 houses and 42,000 apartments, the Bay Area News Group reported Thursday.

  • redditsuckss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    7 months ago

    Who is forced to have home insurance?

    If you can afford a Californian mortgage, you can afford to leave the state and buy your house outright.

    But some people think they’re “too good” for that, while they complain about not being able to afford where they currently are.

      • redditsuckss@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        Exactly. I don’t think the government requires people to have home insurance.

        I certainly don’t have it.

        • girl@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          The original comment never said the government was forcing people to have it. Most people need a mortgage to own a home, few are privileged enough to avoid a mortgage by inheriting a home or buying one outright. Less than 25% of homeowners own their home outright. So most are effectively forced to have home insurance

          • derf82@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            And you wouldn’t want to see your mortgage rate if that mortgage was no longer secured with a collateral asset, which is what a mortgage without insurance would essentially be. Unsecured debt always has much higher rates. You are better off with insurance. You pay one way or another.

          • redditsuckss@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            If you can afford a Californian mortgage, you can afford to leave the state and buy your house outright.

            But some people think they’re “too good” for that, while they complain about not being able to afford where they currently are.

            See: https://lemmy.ca/comment/8157092

            He’s complaining that cheaper areas aren’t good enough for him and that his current area is too expensive.

            He thinks he’s entitled to more before others who have less, just like most city-folk.

            • girl@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Your arrogance and projection shines through your comments. Reddit sucks indeed, and you are making lemmy a more toxic and miserable place to be. Blocked

            • JungleJim@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              You stupid fuck, running around trying to show everyone your clever argument like a child with a scribble they did. I just moved AWAY from a small town to a big city to get away from the crushing poverty and isolation and idiots like you. My point to you was rhetorical, because that’s what you’re asking people to do. Not that it’s my own life’s position. Here’s my position. I’ll dox myself here; Putnam County Florida, poorest county in the most “successful” red State, which can’t stop hemorrhaging jobs or money because the governor only cares about how tall his shoes make him. And that’s the best conservatives can offer. So I’ve recently moved across the fucking country to find work in a place I can. Actually afford to live because they pay a fair wage. And rent is the same. Coffee is the same. Bread costs the same. But they also have public services, public transportation. And my neighbors aren’t meth heads, conspiracy theorists, hateful racists and bigots. Not anymore. Not since I left the sorts of places you’re telling people to “just move to” as if moving across the country doesn’t cost a shit ton of money people don’t have. Hell, moving across town is expensive, and you want people to just drop everything and go live in Texas or some shit. Fuck off, you have no idea clearly.

              Edit: And I’m actually free here. I can smoke weed. My girlfriend is in charge of her own body. I can vote without worrying it will be thrown out or the governor will send the sherrif at me. I can buy an electric vehicle without anyone screaming about George Soros whoever he is. I can feel comfortable knowing my lunch meat wasn’t sliced by children. So many things you pay to suffer for I chose to pay to avoid.

              • redditsuckss@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                13
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Lol. I love how you start off with an insult. Really shows your rational approach to the subject.

                My point still stands. If you can’t afford where you currently live, you need to move somewhere cheaper.

                If those cheaper locations aren’t good enough for you, then why should you get more before the people who live there? You can’t afford it. They can’t afford it. But you think you’re entitled to it before they are.

                Rather than move and improve these places, you think you’re entitled to live in areas you cannot afford.

                You think supply and demand doesn’t apply to you and other people should foot the bill for your entitlement.

                And of course, you get mad and throw a tantrum at anyone who calls it out. This is why you started off your comment by calling me a “stupid fuck”.

    • JungleJim@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      “just upend your entire life and everything you’ve worked for to move to some hellhole flatland state that mainly exists for late night TV jokes to be made about it, where everyone will hate you for your previous life you were forced to give up, because these same cornfed fuckwads want to live in the 1700s, and say you have to join them or they’ll burn crosses on your lawn”

      K

      • redditsuckss@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        7 months ago

        What? Cheaper areas aren’t good enough for you?

        Why should you get more before the people who live in those areas if you can’t afford it?

        Answer: Entitlement.

        • JungleJim@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          So if I can’t afford to live where I do because my tax dollars support your flyover state that repeatedly wastes the money on corruption instead of helping peoplw, I need to leave the land I was born to join the untoothed masses? That’s the conservative way, isn’t it? “Oh, we ruined your progress, you should have to do it out way now.”

          There’s nothing wrong with the land itself, just the people who live there who shaped their society.

          • redditsuckss@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            7 months ago

            If you can’t afford to live somewhere, then you have to go somewhere cheaper.

            It’s part of supply and demand and you’re not exempt from it, despite how entitled you may feel.

            You’re also stereotyping which shows your lack of experience outside of major cities. Most of your fear comes from what you do not know or understand.

            Unfortunately, you are already too far gone. For you to make better financial decisions, you’d have to admit you’re wrong; and nobody wants to do that.

            Good luck waiting for other people to solve your problems. I’m sure that will work out, eventually.

              • redditsuckss@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Not really. I just said things you don’t like so you pretend they’re not relevant.

                I see it all the time from people like you.

      • redditsuckss@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        Being forced to have home insurance is ridiculous.

        Keyword: forced

        News flash, you need to brush up on your reading comprehension.

        • rektdeckard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Brush up on YOUR reading comprehension. The only party requiring insurance is a mortgage lender, and you were suggesting moving to some shithole cheap enough to pay cash for a house. My point is, even if you own outright – shit, ESPECIALLY if you own outright – it’s probably a good idea.

          I fucking hate insurance companies too, but you know what? My car was hit by an unlicensed driver less than 2 weeks ago and was totaled. I would be fucking SCREWED right now if I didn’t have car insurance. Instead I’m getting the car loan paid off and a check for the remaining $20k I can do whatever I want with. It’s gonna be to buy a new car, but I have the choice, instead of holding the bag of shit.

            • rektdeckard@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Listen, I know you didn’t explicitly say “don’t pay for insurance, move somewhere cheap!”, but you absolutely implied it with your argument. Who is forced? Nobody, you’re right. But realistically, if you want to either:

              A. Like where you live, or B. have even a fraction of financial safety

              you must. Very very few people can afford to purchase a house with cash, especially now, and especially first-generation home buyers. That gives you a pretty unfortunate choice to make.

              My main point is, your rhetoric shows that you think WE are the problem. That average Americans should give up the idea that we could live in a city where there is culture, diversity, good education, public transit, and god forbid modest housing options.