• FuglyDuck
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Nope. They need an amoral chode in place to defend white/christian nationalism.

    Which is vaguely ironic considering.

    • Beefy-Tootz
      link
      fedilink
      114 months ago

      After Roe v. Wade was overturned, there was a lot of speculation Loving V. Virgina would be on the chopping block next. I’d argue that’s a strong contender for Irony, wouldn’t you agree?

      • FuglyDuck
        link
        fedilink
        English
        134 months ago

        so, part of why Harlan Crow (Nazis, white supremacist rich fuck) and Clarence Thomas make less-strange bedfellows is because Clarence Thomas is/was a black supremacist. Basically they make the same arguments while playing for a different team.

        That Thomas was a black guy willing to fuck over civil rights made him a very useful tool to white supremacists.

        Loving V. Virginia is… offensive to black assholes, too.