• FuglyDuck
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Nope. They need an amoral chode in place to defend white/christian nationalism.

      Which is vaguely ironic considering.

      • Beefy-Tootz
        link
        fedilink
        114 months ago

        After Roe v. Wade was overturned, there was a lot of speculation Loving V. Virgina would be on the chopping block next. I’d argue that’s a strong contender for Irony, wouldn’t you agree?

        • FuglyDuck
          link
          fedilink
          English
          134 months ago

          so, part of why Harlan Crow (Nazis, white supremacist rich fuck) and Clarence Thomas make less-strange bedfellows is because Clarence Thomas is/was a black supremacist. Basically they make the same arguments while playing for a different team.

          That Thomas was a black guy willing to fuck over civil rights made him a very useful tool to white supremacists.

          Loving V. Virginia is… offensive to black assholes, too.