• @snaggen@programming.devOP
    link
    fedilink
    155 months ago

    Well, if the only thing you need from reflection is the name of a type, so then yes. But I wouldn’t really call this reflection since it is very limited.

    • Ephera
      link
      fedilink
      95 months ago

      Yeah, Rust can’t have proper reflection, since there’s no external runtime environment that keeps track of your state. Any such smartness either has to be compiled-in (which is how std::any and macros work) or you can implement something to keep track of this state at runtime, as if you were partially building a runtime environment.

        • @QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          15 months ago

          And compile-time reflection will probably also continue to suck due to some irreconcilable limitations of type-safe generic specialization. Oh how I would love an equivalent to C++ template parameter packs…

        • @anlumo@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          05 months ago

          No, the Rust Project recently made sure that Rust can’t have compile-time reflection.