“they” uses the same number of characters as “s/he” and flows more naturally
it’s had offline navigation for years now
google maps can do that too though
try a factor of 100
I was referring to the fair in your hypothetical smartass
as if random civilians with guns wouldn’t bumble around more and also shoot the crowd?
metal detectors? pretty easy since it’s a ticketed event
that doesn’t necessarily mean it is possible though. just to be clear
how is a concern about upending precedent a nonsensical statement? the source of an argument does not impact its validity as a point
but it functions as a whataboutism. it doesn’t address the original concerns of the statement. instead it uses an ad hominem attach to discredit the argument
but it functions as a whataboutism. it doesn’t address the original concerns of the statement. instead it uses an ad hominem attach to discredit the argument
not saying you’re wrong, but that is a whataboutism
I meant that both only exist due to the labor of individuals. without the workforce, billionaires and corporations would not exist
arguably billionaires and corporations are still people-powered
edit: as in the wealth of billionaires and corporations only exists due to the exploration of the labor of the people. without that labor, billionaires wouldn’t exist
interesting that you assume the teacher is a he
humans have been making do with much less than what you have for hundreds of thousands of years. making do also does not necessarily exclude political action
then make do with what you’ve got
no they’re arguing that companies should not be allowed to intentionally make addicting products. akin to the difference between the caffeine found in coffee vs if a company started selling pure caffeine powder
oh no!! good thing that doesn’t impact anything