deleted by creator
deleted by creator
What should happen is not always what does happen. There are tons of examples of brain dead companies and rich people buying companies they dont understand and then ruining them because of that.
Realistically none aside from testing that our models are good.
Best case scenario the particle accelerators we use to make them take months, years just to produce a couple atoms that last maybe a few seconds then decay to something much less stable
The island of stability isn’t going to result in anything most people would consider “stable” i.e no Naquadah or Trinium. It could however, result in new superheavy isotopes that last seconds instead of milliseconds or microseconds like what would otherwise be expected.
The island of (relative) stability results from the filling of nuclear shells similarly to how noble gases are as unreactive as they are in chemical reactions because their (electron) shells are full.
And your suggestion is what exactly?
deleted by creator
Walmart prices:
512 GB Ally: $399
512 GB Steam Deck: $499
deleted by creator
If enough people believe that it is, they’re not going to be as likely to fight things that they should be.
Saying nothing at all is better than only being allowed to say good things and none of the bad. The former doesnt shift opinions in either direction but the latter introduces a pro-buying bias to reviews. Good for the publisher and no one else.
Saying both parties are the same is an early sign of dementia.
No the SCOTUS IS predictable and in a bad way.
Op does have the power to post the exact same link that this person did.
Has anyone in a position of authority ever faced consequences for this? Because in Cannon’s case, you’d have to prove that she didn’t have a legitimate reason to do what she did and that it rose to the level of an ethics violation deserving of punishment. Which we can infer given the obvious conflict of interest but if that was enough to punish her it would have probably happened by now. And the standard for evidence required to punish a judge like that is reasonably high.
Civil trial consequences are always only monetary - you can’t go to prison for a civil case. That’s part of why civil cases get away with having a much lower standard of evidence
Which is exactly why I mentioned it. He has never faced consequences from criminal charges, only civil court.
You’ll notice he started hawking Bibles almost immediately afterward, likely because he needs more liquid funding in the short term.
He would have done that regardless of whether he “needed” funds or not. Like most obscenely rich people, there is no such thing as “enough” wealth.
I believe he’s been fined for it several times now, but the fine is set by law and is an amount that’s a pittance to Trump.
Which doesn’t really contradict my point that he effectively hasn’t faced any real consequences.
you’ve still got to figure out how to work his Secret Service detail into the picture.
He’s a criminal. He shouldn’t be afforded the same security detail as his predecessors that weren’t. We don’t “have to” do anything. It was just decided as a society that this man, and others like him, should be given privileges that others don’t have.
And also the protests from his cult if/when that happens.
This should never ever ever factor into what his punishment is. A functioning society needs a justice system that doesn’t cave to mobs.
Everything about this is abhorrant.
Id love to be wrong here but Trump has been impeached twice (which did jack shit because the republicans in the senate would have had to help convict him) and the only real consequences for what hes done were in civil trials and even that was monetary. They didnt even make him pay the bail bond he was initially “required” to pay. He’s been threatened with consequences for contempt of court over a dozen times now.
Unfortunately the best predictor of the future is the past and the past hasnt laid a hand on him.
Just because the company you work for is making bank doesn’t mean they won’t fire you at the drop of a hat if they think they can make more by doing it.
Just because something is supposed to happen does not mean that it will. By all rights Trump should have been kicked out of office and be sitting in jail right now but he isnt. Just like Nixon and a whole cadre of others that slithered away without facing any real consequences.
Did you not read the title at least? How does firing all these people indicate they know what theyre doing?