Israel clothes itself in the garments of the Jewish people and uses them to defend it’s actions. It claims that any action against it is an action against the Jewish people.

Now I know that there are Jewish people around the world saying “not in my name”, but it’s also why so many supporters of Israel exist. You can’t divorce the religious aspect from this war. If it wasn’t there this wouldn’t be allowed to happen.

I don’t seen how else you do it.

“Removing the stigma” is desensitizing by definition. So you want to desensitize through… what? Education?

Yeah I mean it’s just a more easy to use Photoshop basically.

Photoshop has the same technology baked into it now. Sure, it has “safeguards” so it may not generate nudes, but it would have no trouble depicting someone “having dinner with Bill Cosby” or whatever you feel is reputation destroying.

Technically and legally the photos would be considered child porn

I don’t think that has been tested in court. It would be a reasonable legal argument to say that the image isn’t a photo of anyone. It doesn’t depict reality, so it can’t depict anyone.

I think at best you can argue it’s a form of photo manipulation, and the intent is to create a false impression about someone. A form of image based libel, but I don’t think that’s currently a legal concept. It’s also a concept where you would have to protect works of fiction otherwise you’ve just made the visual effects industry illegal if you’re not careful.

In fact, that raises an interesting simily. We do not allow animals to be abused, but we allow images of animal abuse in films as long as they are faked. We allow images of human physical abuse as long as they are faked. Children are often in horror films, and creating the images we see is very strictly managed so that the child actor is not exposed to anything that could distress them. The resulting “works of art” are not under such limitations as far as I’m aware.

What’s the line here? Parental consent? I think that could lead to some very concerning outcomes. We all know abusive parents exist.

I say all of this, not because I want to defend anyone, but because I think we’re about to set some really bad legal precidents if we’re not careful. Ones that will potentially do a lot of harm. Personally, I don’t think the concept of any image, or any other piece of data, being illegal holds water. Police people’s actions, not data.

Veggie is a lot easier than vegan. Ghee is used a lot in Indian cooking.

Everybody did. Now we have everything.

Things get less well connected in the more eastern nations, especially heading down to Greece.

Disagree. Central Paris is something special. Like any European capital there’s tons of stuff to see and do.

It falls off off a cliff once you’ve done the centre though.

…but it all goes wrong again at the south coast. Even the locals leave for the summer.

They are safe on the space station. They have all the time they need to sort it out. They can even wait for another craft to arrive.

Do you think a style guide is enough for an open source code base? Contributions could be coming from lots of directions, and the code review process to enforce a style guide is going to be a lot of work. Even rejecting something takes time.

Furthermore there are many changes to NumPy internals, including continuing to migrate code from C to C++, that will make it easier to improve and maintain NumPy in the future.

I realise that C can be rather low level a lot of the time, but I’m not sure I’d pick C++ to help keep things easy to maintain. It opens up a Pandora’s box of possibilities.

Since Apple’s keynote this week.

You are, if you’re calling for Apple like features.

You might argue that “private cloud” is privacy preserving, but you can only implement that with the cash of Apple. I would also argue that anything leaving my machine, to a bunch of servers I don’t control, without my knowledge is NOT preserving my privacy.

I don’t understand the people who say they’d be bored if they didn’t work.

I think it’s that they would miss the sense of achievement that comes from a group collaboration on a shared goal. Doesn’t mean it needs to be what they do today, but I suspect you’d find these people in community projects if you didn’t have to earn.

I wouldn’t be so quick to write it off.

It’s a proof of concept showing the weaknesses in Microsoft’s vetting process for extensions published on the store. They then used the process to get pseudo-malicious code inside hundreds of organisations (not hundred of installs) some of which are high profile.

Yes and no.

You have to eat less than you consume, and going to the gym doesn’t “burn calories” in a significant enough amount to make a difference. So there you’re right.

However, the biggest factor in your consumption rate is how much muscle you have. You can be laying in bed, but your muscles still need feeding. You just don’t keep muscles very long laying in bed all the time.

So, does the gym help weight loss? No, not directly, but increasing your muscle mass can.

While I was vacating my colleagues…

I’m reminded of a scene from The Wire:

https://youtu.be/h5d82ndui_s

(I know. I removed a comma from the quote, but that’s how I read it)

It does matter in distributed application on LANs. The thin client model is still in operation at a lot of HPC and similar environments. Laptops and Desktops just display what is being done elsewhere.

Remote X11 is a better user experience in that environment than anything else I’ve tried. It feels like the application is local even if it’s not.

Still worth trying.

The word “support” is used in a very corporate way in the ROCm docs. They mean in terms of support contracts, sending engineers out to customer sites, having people dedicated to specific customers.

The code works on more devices than they list, but they won’t enter into a support contract with anyone using anything but their latest and greatest.