![](/static/23fb711/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/db7182d9-181a-45e1-b0aa-6768f144911a.jpeg)
Right, the charges aren’t absurd at all. No one is above the law; not Hunter, not Trump. It applies to everyone. The evidence was provided to a jury of his peers, and they determined that that evidence proved his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Right, the charges aren’t absurd at all. No one is above the law; not Hunter, not Trump. It applies to everyone. The evidence was provided to a jury of his peers, and they determined that that evidence proved his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Ah, very fair. Was not aware of this! That would certainly skew the voting metrics to some degree.
Oh I’m not saying you can’t comment and discuss. That’s the whole point right?
But you can also just downvote the post if ya don’t like it and move on? I just see some posts of stuff where it’ll have a solid ratio of upvotes to downvotes, but then see people comment “why are we posting [x]?” Because it has more upvotes than downvotes? If you don’t like it and want to send a message, then downvote? I think discussing is a waste of time.
Although I guess I’m part of the problem by continuing the discussion lol
Missing: I drink a lot of pee
pssst, that’s what the downvote button if for 😉
No one single word can represent someone’s entire world view. It’s simply not possible.
The administration has actually done quite a bit in the background surprisingly. You do need to dig for it though
I think it’s flawed to say that something is moral if it is legal and vice versa.
I think the headline and first few sentences of the article are purposely misleading. They bank on their audiences only reading the headline or a portion of the article in order to make people jump to conclusions, instead of putting the conclusion or main point in the headline.
Be real; what is the first thing you think of when you read that headline? I think most people would assume people are walking out because he said or did something to make them walk out. Not because of the weather. It’s really news worthy that people left a rally because it was cold? C’mon now.
Yes- it’s on audiences to critically think about what they read, but journalism like this certainly doesn’t help. And they know this.
Obviously subjective, but to me that is unethical journalism.
How dare they make us tell our customers how much everything will cost!
Yeah seriously. As much as I would love to think his fans were walking out on him, that is not the case.
Are there no ethical standards for journalism?
Well of course! The only possible discourse we can have about the topic is if we assume capitalism is the best and only political economic model we can have.
Yeah, the economy is going great for the top few. That’s what’s meant by “The Economy”. Always has been.
Peasants, We have increased your daily crumb rations by 1.2%. Be grateful for that.
The haggling boosts my ego and makes me feel POWERFUL
Oh, Boeing. What a surprise.
Fr you can talk to the AI version of me. I ain’t socializing in real life you kidding me??
Don’t be dissing my silly putty like that 😤. At least silly putty can be molded to be tolerant toward others.