• 0 Posts
  • 25 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 2nd, 2023

help-circle
rss
  • I’m here to support.

    Count #1: Guilty

    Count #2: Guilty

    Count #3: Guilty

    Count #4: Guilty

    Count #5: Guilty

    Count #6: Guilty

    Count #7: Guilty

    Count #8: Guilty

    Count #9: Guilty

    Count #10: Guilty

    Count #11: Guilty

    Count #12: Guilty

    Count #13: Guilty

    Count #14: Guilty

    Count #15: Guilty

    Count #16: Guilty

    Count #17: Guilty

    Count #18: Guilty

    Count #19: Guilty

    Count #20: Guilty

    Count #21: Guilty

    Count #22: Guilty

    Count #23: Guilty

    Count #24: Guilty

    Count #25: Guilty

    Count #26: Guilty

    Count #27: Guilty

    Count #28: Guilty

    Count #29: Guilty

    Count #30: Guilty

    Count #31: Guilty

    Count #32: Guilty

    Count #33: Guilty

    Count #34: Guilty














  • To clarify a point I don’t think the people replying have specifically pointed out enough already: this line of thinking is contrary to a representative democracy. If some people aren’t worthy of voting, then they aren’t worthy of being represented by their government (e.g. slaves, felons, children). That’s the main disagreement I have with that idea.

    If you truly believe there’s a measurable line for intelligence/competence below which people shouldn’t vote, are you worried there are so many people in that group that it would affect the outcome? If that’s true, then don’t they deserve representation? This problem is solved if everyone votes. Shouldn’t we just try to educate people instead of creating another marginalized group?