No, I wasn’t referring to her. FFS. Like I understand why you would say that, because him considering his own suffering is just too selfish to be taken into consideration when asking why he did it, and us considering it as a part of his decision making process or that laws and systemic issues line this shit up like bowling pins? Noo! That’s not allowed when considering motive… he’s just EVIL which is a scientific term and influenced by SATAN because he DIDNT VOTE REPUBLICAN and probably LIVED AMONGST IMMIGRANTS /s

Like seriously, Americans are fucking stupid sometimes.

Bro… I just listed the reasons… like if you don’t want to understand human nature, human psychology, sociology or why systemic issues are apart of creating the conditions that would allow this to happen, then that’s your dumbass problem.

Like seriously. Read a fucking book - and not the Abrahamic ones. Those rot your brain.

Once more, and I’ll probably be dogpiled this time as well, but democrats are neo-liberals and republicans are (traditionally) classical liberals. “Conservative” is short hand for “socially conservative liberal”.

Liberalism is a right wing ideology, designed by political philosophers and gamed by yee olde barons and aristocrats of yesteryear to give us this soft-imperialistic oligarchy that has been built on the backs of labour in the west, as well as the wage slavery in the east.

Case in point, the Tories in the UK are also liberals, whose Brexit campaign solely wanted to prevent immigration - although getting rid of EU fiscal regulations was probably the real reason.

“Evil” is a social construct for people in the dark ages, because it holds as much merit as believing in fairies.

Again, you are really in denial of human nature, and as such don’t know that the conditions I mentioned set the stage for this kind of thing to happen.

Do you know that you can be corrupted, that you can commit murder, if the conditions are right?

The two paths merged reveal a third option: the manbear.

“Inconvenienced”?

Oh I’m sorry. Taking care of someone for the rest of their lives, not being able to, not having the means to and all the while suffering for it is something you think is a walk in the fucking park?

I think the key word here is “suffer”. Americans worship suffering. It gives them a hard on. So when someone wants to end the suffering, that’s an insult. Typical ugly American mentality, devoid of any understanding for human nature and full of piss and vinegar. Also, it’s unrealistic and kind of naive, because I bet this happens more often than you think - but it’s hard to actually figure out. Why? Let me count the ways.

You have a judicial system committing mass judicial murder on a weekly basis “because you can’t afford the fight the case”, a for profit health sector that would pull plugs in concert if an insurance company told them to, doctors and surgeons dodging malpractice suits on a cross-state basis like it’s a sport and you’re probably happy knowing he’ll be sent to a for profit prison system that makes profits in the billions, where he’ll become a slave for the state to “pay back his debt to society”.

But sure, means and needs were not the issue. He should have pulled himself up by his bootstraps and gotten that 4th job.

Bro, you swam in yuppies? It’s gotta take years to get the stank out… need to throw away all your clothes, smelling like fireballs, daddy issues and repression in this bitch.

Maybe? I mean the big criticism is that it’s just highly processed food at the end of the day and that the process of production is what is the issue. This is of course an argument made by what you may call food purists, who’d rather you spend money on a proper blender than rely on big corporations to form Scop 2.0.

But that’s not what Ronnie boy is thinking about. Oh no. He’s thinking about “owning the libs”, “showing them what for”, and what kind of cretinous, disingenuous bastard he can be. He would gladly invest in something like Scop 2.0 if it made a lot of money, AND performatively ban it in his state if it vaguely had an LGBTQ+ tinge to it.

This is a careful reminder that some states banned solar panels out of spite… because people elect absolute troglodytes to represent them, and then have the balls to talk about “free markets”.

GTFO here with your fake self. In fact, take the whole republican party with you.

ZioNazis shopping their boots I see.

“respect people with sticks up their asses.”

There, fixed it, ya soulless dregs. Couldn’t put a little colour in your life even. That would be too much.

Goddamn. If there’s ever a class action suit where the witnesses get leaked, we might see the first case of corporate serial killing…

Can we then finally have corporal punishment for corporations plz? Corporal corporate punishment.

Jesus was a Jew named Joshua who was against money lending in the temple.

That’s the historically accurate Jesus though, and not the M16 wielding anti-Semite white Jesus, who’s look seems to say “WTF IS A KILOMETER!!!” as eagles swoop on high.

You know, fake Jesus.

I propose the “Colonization Remembrance Group” and the “Colonization Remembrance Act”. Just replace all mentions of holocaust denial with colonization denial, and all mentions of anti-semitism with pro-colonizer.

The AM band is the strongest of the two. Some countries however have made AM illegal to use in consumer vehicles, because it is used by military and state.

They’re just looking for justice, and maybe a little nosh.

How long until it turns into a Satanist? Considering he’s supposed to be all moral, I can’t help but think that at some point it does an A/B and reaches the correct conclusion.

Publicize it. As a matter of fact, make a libre open source equivalent that anyone can install and use.

Seize the means of electoral analysis.

Well, well, well. Now the *free speech absolutists" are showing their true side.

The gun is good?

It sounds like it was easy. What’s she call her literal killing grounds, “the gravel pit”? No, ma’am, even though Wu is for the children, no child should be aware of your gravel pit.

That dog was too young from what she expected from it. Her reason does not hold up.