![](/static/23fb711/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/gWmVEUZ94Z.png)
I’m more annoyed with the people who reply to this low-effort garbage
I’m more annoyed with the people who reply to this low-effort garbage
I think they said that they specifically don’t want to tank the local economy, just the tourism sector.
A large tourism sector can be a detriment to a smaller city or town if the local people don’t have enough control or investment in the sector themselves.
It’s definitely good to organize, but if they are in the US, building publicly housing (an obvious solution) is illegal, so things aren’t straightforward even if you obtain some power.
We are talking local level. It’s actually possible to get things done, especially if you lay the groundwork and get some help. It doesn’t need to be OP getting in the door, just start small and eventually their org can get someone to step up and take a position of power.
It’s only smuglord-worthy if we are at the federal level imo
It’s just a messenger app. Whatsapp is probably used by more criminals on the whole, but there’s no reason for that to make the news
lemmy.ml is nominally leftist, so an anticapitalist text dump is in-bounds, I believe
It’s a coincidence
I think the model that you’re referring to is generally more applicable to hardware, but since you can make free copies of an app, Uber for instance can keep things low cost till they eat the competition
I mean it was nonsense to think it would solve your costs, but streaming is superior to cable TV from a tech standpoint for sure.
People should expect that yeah, new software is cheap when it’s rolled out, but it’s gonna get more expensive as time goes on, but I can understand why that wasn’t quite as apparent to people 10 years ago as it will be 10 years from now
It’s overly amplified by liberal propagandists, but there’s at least enough of a connection to make a note of
By that measure, Xi is also implicated
I see your point, but that’s a topic that should be up for discussion among your hypothetical Party/legislature. I don’t think it has a clear answer.
You don’t see his pandering to the EU as stumbling backwards into this whole situation in the first place?
I understand that it comes across as provocative, but from what I understand about his (attempted) maneuvering over the past couple years, he’s kind of a spineless and weak leader who trusted the wrong side and got his country embroiled in a massive conflict.
NATO and the US are not trustworthy allies, and they let him talk up "Ukraine joining NATO ", a very dangerous thing to do, but I don’t believe they had any intention of letting them in at any point. Zelensky should have understood this.
Damn was there nowhere to evacuate to? (Makes sense being an island and all)
Edit: damn first thing tiktok shows me is people getting into the water while everything burns around them
(not a liberal, but) The infrastructure bill was mediocre but should lead to some improvements over the next decade or so.
They recently protected some indigenous land from uranium mining.
Ummmmmmm, anything else after the last 3 years or so?
Somebody post the wkuk press conference sketch
Arch
(I use Arch btw)
You can get ones with heated water and warm air drying capability (they are more than $30 though)
thunderbolt
Heh 😏
The Chinese government stacks the cards though it actually has the capability to use some toothpicks to hold them in place, and will immediately rebuild it things start to fall apart.
To contrast, the US will flounder and pull their one “low interest rates” lever while having a political blowout over some sort of stimulus funding package that probably won’t pass.
Stop by the news megathread sometime and see/ask for yourself. You probably won’t agree with a lot of stuff (and even that’s partly cause there’s layers of irony caked onto the walls), but it’s not quite as bad as you think.