I mean, absentee votes in Montana are not a very good target if it was intentional.
I mean, absentee votes in Montana are not a very good target if it was intentional.
I think it’s pie with the same amount of steps.
Gerrymandering affects the house. It’s the electoral college that affects the presidential election.
Seriously, their bias is right in the name.
They are not fully in control because the ruling didn’t say that affirmative action couldn’t be a government requirement. It said that a policy that enables affirmative action violates the constitution.
So, they are no longer asking applicants about race or ethnicity information. But they are expanding recruitment and financial aid to prioritize low income students.
I’m not agreeing with the court ruling, just clarifying the false representation of the issue with regard to the school.
But that doesn’t make sugar bad. It makes too much sugar bad, which seems to be what they were saying. Albeit, ineloquently. **Insert thought terminating insult.
This but unironically.
I’m pretty sure we were literally designed to do what we’re doing.
This mf out here thinking they aren’t the result of millions of years of evolution.
I, too, use xenophobic stereotypes to fuel my superiority complex.
It’s how we know pee is stored in the balls.
I ain’t here to kink shame, and yet, I am.
Seasonally affected gang. Cold bones gang.
In other words, and less often repeated, “half of them are smarter than that!”
The great cornholio is more articulate than I remember.
I suppose a woman of color will just have to wait then.🙄
“The electorate” was racist when Obama ran too, and there were racists saying he shouldn’t run too.
Surely. But if your purpose it to affect the ultimate outcome with the electoral college in mind, then this is not a good choice. It’s not exactly a swing state. Far from it.