![](/static/23fb711/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/2QNz7bkA1V.png)
I’ve seen this mentioned a few times before but never get how it works. How do you even use TikTok as a search engine?
I’ve seen this mentioned a few times before but never get how it works. How do you even use TikTok as a search engine?
The only evidence to overturn the election points to republicans
What iPhone you have?
You have to keep them pressed until the turn off screen appears, then just cancel the turning off
Tesla, Newton, Coulomb, Faraday
Typical 1-off error
Bout tree fiddy
Now thinking about it in terms of mathematical logic, the DoJ and Supreme Court‘s interpretations is wrong:
It’s actually a law of logic (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Morgan's_laws) that says that:
not (A and B and C)
is equal to
(not A) or (not B) or (not C)
—
In this case:
The defendant is eligible for relief if he does not (A and B and C)
Which is the same as
The defendant is a eligible for relief if he does (not A) or (not B) or (not C)
—
Which is not what the DoJ is saying. The DoJ is saying that
not (A and B and C)
is equal to
(not A) and (not B) and (not C)
Right! I feel like I’m going crazy because I don’t see how can you interpret it the other way!
lower courts were sharply divided on the vital question of whether “and” bundles the conditions—as in, you don’t have (A), don’t have (B), and don’t have ©—which would mean a defendant who lacked any one of these conditions would be eligible for relief. The alternative reading, advocated by the Justice Department, holds that “and” really means “or”—that a defendant who met even one of the conditions would not be eligible for relief
The reporter seems to be getting this totally wrong. It’s like he is saying the exact opposite of what I understand. From my point of view:
If a defendant would be elegible for relief if he lacked any one of the conditions, that is actually interpreting that AND means OR.
If a defendant would be eligible for relief if he lacked all of the conditions, that is interpreting that AND means AND.
There’s already like seven countries with territorial claims in Antarctica
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Territorial_claims_in_Antarctica
That’s not how extends works 😂 you silly goose
Play lots of AAA games
They are not struggling for money. In fact they have so much money they don’t know what to do with it.
Thing about Arsenal they always try to walk it in
Are you assuming the Taco Bell's gender?
Looks nice! Is this going to become the default font in GitHub and VSCode?
O