In what circumstances would you consider murder a smart choice?

Is it too difficult to post some context?

How does that work? Umlauts can totally change the meaning of a word.

Konnte - was able, könnte - could, musste - had to, müsste - should, hatte - have had, hätte - would have.

Darn it, all this time I thought I was on Lemmy!

What was his answer?

deleted by creator

¯\_(ã )_/¯

print('¯\_(ツ)_/¯'.encode('u8').decode('l1'))

Beyoncé

Many, many parts of the standard library are written in C. Most performance critical parts are.

Do you need a pre-compiled tomllib? If you are using toml a lot, maybe. But chances are that you aren't reading a lot of toml files, and if you are, then you're probably already using rtoml.

deleted by creator

This website is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

If I was a lawyer, I'd say that this sentence could be interpreted in a way that the audio stream is licensed as cc-by-nc-sa, too, i.e. you are sublicensing the songs to anybody. This is even more illegal than simply broadcasting music without licensing it. It's a fun and games until RIAA comes to break your knee caps.

There are no calls to appbrain.com from lemmy.today. Chances are your own system is compromised.

Do spider webs count as decoration?

"Hey, Wired, weird thing with our search algorithm. It seems to always put you on page 2 since your article dropped. I wonder why that is?" – Larry Page, probably.

Canadian Aboriginal syllabics to the rescue!

Yeah, both Voyager and the normal lemmy web client escape the less-than sign. I tried it twice on both clients.

A semicolon ends a statement, and semicolon is a statement on its own. One that does nothing. That's why you can write

int i;
for (i = 0; i ᐸ 3; i++);

to set i = 3. You can use that pattern to find something in an iterator, etc. But I would prefer

int i = 0;
while (i ᐸ 3) {
   i++;
}

for readability.

Would an anti-banana give off normal matter?

Why not upload another avatar? Maybe an empty black square or the lemmy logo?

Didn't we already go through this with Whatsername and her fake blood tests?

Maybe read more than the title before commenting? I know, it's a novel concept.

People quite rightly think of Elizabeth Holmes as a fraud for making false medical claims about what the Theranos machines could do. So why aren't Elon's claims at Neuralink being held to the same level of scrutiny?