![](/static/23fb711/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/db7182d9-181a-45e1-b0aa-6768f144911a.jpeg)
But it’s also sort of taking both sides of an issue, and/or using idiocy as a trial balloon. So yeah idk
But it’s also sort of taking both sides of an issue, and/or using idiocy as a trial balloon. So yeah idk
This can just get appealed, right? I mean obviously the clock is on Trump’s side, but a judge can’t just magically wave away crimes on double Jeopardy like this, can they?
Then she will get a raise and be on fox news for a decade
Because they have a political science department?
Gerrymandering would make the president like the House. 55% of voters select Democrats but then 52% of selected representatives are Republicans 🤔
She’s like 33
OK so normally when you are accused of a crime, you hire a lawyer who advises you not to talk about the charges. Why? Because then you say dumb shit like “well it was manslaughter because he robbed me” when your defense was focused on casting doubt it was you who pulled the trigger.
In this case, Trump may not be an authority, and that’s the point, it speaks to his INTENT. His intent was clearly to circumvent rules. Why is this even a discussion? This has all been thoroughly parsed.
Uh yeah, even the stuff the president has authority for, he’d need an executive authority, which is more than just shouting I DECLARE IT’S DECLASSIFIED in a hallway of the Pentagon.
A) he said he doesn’t
B) he’s not the declassification authority on all classified information
Maybe Biden could win Florida
I have definitely seen this over the years.
Meet the bus
If there was another memorable line from this movie, I’d be quoting it. The utter genius.
“on paper”. You only add this in when everyone knows it’s not actually true, but someone wrote it was.
How about since McCain picked Sarah’ “pallin’ around with terrorists”, doesn’t rear the news’ Palin?
Oddly, no discussion about any of the debate writers and legislature had about this bill. As a lay person, I can kind of see both sides, would prefer the defendants win, but also feel like the INTENT of this recent law would be easy to find. If the intent was to free loads of people, or only just a few relatively innocent ones… I guess originalism only matters when people have been dead for hundreds of years.
I don’t think you are quite right.
They can override his veto.
I’m not a lawyer but clearly a civil case could be made.
First contact? Annular? Lunar?
I believe in partial and total. All the other eclipses are mental illnesses.