seriously it is so stupid
The net is vast and infinite
seriously it is so stupid
It isnt a theory. Steve Calabresi, one of the founders of the Federalist Society, whom we’d think should be against this interpretation, wrote an article for Reason in support of the original paper.
https://reason.com/volokh/2023/08/10/trump-is-disqualified-from-being-on-any-election-ballots/
The core of the argument is that current context is an extremely good match for the context that created the law in the first place. They seem to believe it enough to think it should be regarded as true. For some reason…
So let’s consider incentives. Why would they want to avoid a court case? Is it possible they’d lose and somehow make a radical event take place in US law?
Maybe they believe it is self-preservation in some way, to avoid a historically significant court decision going against them. Or another way, maybe theyre low key trying to somehow move on.
This may be the closest thing the Republican Party ever does to waving the white flag. They never admit defeat.
The presence of some intelligence is not sufficiently persuasive for changing terminology when the point is to insult them. Duhhhh.
Maybe daft raft would roll off the tongue more easily
Can we stop saying think tank, as though these dummies actually think…?
It’s an opinion piece
Im rubber and you’re glue
whoosh as the joke flies over your head
He wasnt even President then.
Let’s take it further. Why is history mostly about politics and warfare? As tho natural history is less important…
And July 4th is not the nation’s birthday. It’s simply the day the colonists said fuck you to England.
v1 of USA: 1774 with Continental Association v2: 1777 with Articles of Confederation v3: 1787 with Constitution
deleted by creator
Fuck those people. They only want out to pursue tyrannical bullshit, which theyre rightfully held back from via Oregon laws.
Tolerance is wonderful, repressive tolerance is not.
Flatpak or just docker would be better. Snap is redundant.