It’s also been mentioned in other parts of this thread, but the holy foreskin has been considered an important relic, and there are accounts of many kings like Charlemagne having owned it.

Then I guess this makes you an Arian heretic. /s

This is your kingdom come

Does Jesus have a gender tho? As stated above, Jesus has a fully human body and nature (or else you are deemed a heretic by the council of Chalcedon). He is described as a man and several churches and rulers have historically claimed to hold a piece of his foreskin, so he must’ve had a penis. Therefore:

• Either Jesus was agender despite having a penis, therefore penis doesn’t imply male gender or
• Jesus was male. So either:
  • Jesus and God don’t have the same gender, so they aren’t the same entity, which the councils of Nicea and Chalcedon would deem a heresy, or
  • God can manifest as male or agender, making Them genderfluid.

Regardless of the result, he’ll say the numbers are fake anyway.

Cornell West then, idk.

That’s the thing, if the democrat’s only rivals are on their right, the only voters they need to court are the moderate right wing, they have no incentive to make any concession to the left, which they can take for granted.

If I were an American, I’d probably vote Harris if and only if I live in a swing state or a state where the margins between votes aren’t too high. In any state where the outcome seems set in stone, I’d vote a third party candidate (probably Jill Stein). They won’t get elected, but if there’s a noticeable increase in the number of votes for them, it might make democrats nervous that their political orientation choices aren’t viable. I’d also start campaigning for the third party the day after the election, regardless of the outcome.

Blart

Thank you, I’ll try. Tho I’d still be interested to by the answer to my original question, since I might want to change other keybinds later…

Tbf, the Guy kept Nanni’s letter of complaint intact in his home, he might’ve been kind of a troll. He might laugh at the idea that people millenias from then laugh at Nanni’s frustration as he perhaps did himself. As to whether our perseption of himself would bother him… Well, he might be the worst copper trader we’ve ever heard off… But we’ve heard of him!

Then I guess so where the microbioms of people whose guts Thanos had already purged.

If the 50% are homogeneously spread -and it’s implied that it is-, then one may assume 50% per person also applies. Like how he didn’t leave 50% of planets alone and purge the rest.

The headline says he merely tried to burn the house tho… If the mission was accomplished, then perhaps he was trying to burn something specific that was on the house? A roach perhaps?

Okay, but the question is how would DNA differ between a Sephardic Jew who was born in Valencia and someone born in Genova from one or both parents of Sephardic Jewish background? They don’t just say he had Spanish and Jewish ancestry, they say he was born in Valencia, despite the previous most widespread theory that he was born in Genova.That’s what intrigues me.

I might be missing something here, but how would a genetic study prove where he was born? I see how it could prove Spanish and Jewish ancestry, but how does it show that he was the immigrant and not his parents? Beside, they even say he was born in Valencia… Awfully precise. And they’re quoting a documentary rather than a research paper…

And not any violence, but domestic violence! Certainly one of the right’s top 3 favourite flavours of violence.

“Please vote for me! I will do anything but stop supporting genocide of people abroad who share your religion.”