Can you imagine how many new conservatists the republican party would have missed if all these mushrooms were consumed?

A date has has been set for the 2.2 million dollars worth of mushroom to be destroyed.

Go vegan

Wow, I never had heard of salicylates. If you combine that with your other allergies that indeed leaves you with a very restricted diet. What I understand is that you could still survive on a vegan diet, but you'd be extremely limited in what you can eat and perhaps have a hard time meeting your daily requirements. Are supplements working for you? I understand your point of view. Thanks for sharing.

Hmm, okay… no is also fine. I have just not heard of any such conditions before. I Googled for it and asked ChatGPT, but got nothing.

What allergies do you have such that without meat you would starve if I may ask?

And this is where I stop communicating with you. Maybe you should reflect on why it is so important to you to be right about something that is so destructive to the planet. Something you want to deny, but don't want to supply any sources for. While at the same time every comment I have written you is backed by sources. You're an asshole.

You'd be fine with it being 100% even if it only needs to be 3% or 4% instead of 20%? Nice.

Nice projection. I am not shifting blame, but since you've said this it shows you're obviously dealing with some massive cognitive dissonance. I have only been providing facts and sources dude. Animal agriculture is a massive source of problems for the planet. Besides all the things I have already told you: what do you think the leading causes of mass extincition, deforestation and global ocean and freshwater eutrophication are? Right…

You can disagree all you want, but climate scientists say it is so:

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jul/20/vegan-diet-cuts-environmental-damage-climate-heating-emissions-study https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/news/201603-plant-based-diets/

Perhaps you might want to start citing sources?

Like what? What do people need that they can't get from a vegan diet?

I know they've changed their name, but they've not changed their position.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27886704/

I already told you it is true, but it means nothing. Animal agriculture is still an incredibly big part of the problem fucking up the planet right now. I think I have supplied you with enough data for that by now. Maybe read it?

I meant it in the context of agriculture. Out of the 20% global emissions caused by agriculture, most of it is caused by animal agriculture. I believe the stat is 18%.

Have you stopped and wondered how big a land mass the size of the US, China, Australia and the EU combined is? I am not sure how many shopping malls you have in mind.

Yes it is true, but it still is a moot point because "producing 1 kg of boneless meat still requires an average of 2.8 kg human-edible feed."

It's not patronising. It is just stating a fact.

https://www.andeal.org/vault/2440/web/JADA_VEG.pdf

If you could free up a land mass the size of the US, China, Australia and the EU combined, don't you think we could plants some trees?

Ok, you wait for the industry to change, while making the planet and its inhabitants die in the mean time. Take no responsibility and complain about large corporations fucking up the planet, while simultaneously funding them.

So it's inefficient like hell and causing a shit ton of greenhouse gasses. Have a look at the impact of some of these foods: https://ourworldindata.org/environmental-impacts-of-food#explore-data-on-the-environmental-impacts-of-food