Uh oh: https://www.rgj.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/09/06/nevada-supreme-court-rules-green-party-ineligible-for-general-election/75109795007/

You’re wrong again

Your local auth services are configured to use LDAP as a source, whatever your local auth mechanism is checks credentials, and then you’re auth’d or not. Some distros have easy to use interfaces to configure this, some don’t, but mostly it’s just configuring pam.d (for Linux), and a caching daemon of some sort to keep locally cached copies of the shadow info so you can auth when the LDAP server can’t be contacted (if you’ve previously authenticated once). You can set up many different authentication sources and backends as well, and set their preferences, restrictions, options…etc.

RHEL/Fedora examples: https://www.redhat.com/sysadmin/pam-authconfig

Debian examples: https://wiki.debian.org/LDAP/PAM

Then you don’t understand how it works with local auth services.

You didn’t read the article

I think you’re missing the point of LDAP then. It’s a centralized directory used for querying information. It’s not necessarily about user information, but can be anything.

What you’re asking for is akin to locally hosting a SQL server that other machines can talk to? Then it’s just a server. Start an LDAP server somewhere, then talk to it. That’s how it works.

If you don’t want a network service for this purpose, then don’t use LDAP. If you want a bunch of users to exist on many machines without having to manually create them, then use LDAP, or a system configuration tool that creates and keeps them all eventually consistent.

I’m okay with this.

Not the green party or communist not jobs necessarily, but the Pro-Putin, “Ukraine is Nazis”, warmongering types…yup.

I think they just mean he’s going to be shouting and borderline, if not outright, sexist and racist.

I’ve seen a lot of seriously obvious and unapologetic shilling for very out there positions around here. The further telltale sign is that when one popular poster starts getting regularly rebuffed and shutdown, backup arrives not long after to pollute a thread with their bullshit.

Guaranteed they are all over the Fediverse and probably hosting their own instances.

BOOM, got’er

Look into a Gl.Inet device. Ships with OpenWRT and can run whatever you want as an integration.

Wow, you might want to tell her Campaign that then: https://www.jillstein2024ballotaccess.com/

AGAIN. MATH.

Regardless of Stein. Regardless of the Muslim 1%. Regardless of any of the other bullshit you keep trying to bring up, the concentration in numbers DOES NOT MATTER.

The problem with people who are cocky and trying to influence something they have zero power to influence is that they are so fucking sure of themselves that they can’t be wrong.

You are wrong.

Fucking wild. Absolutely demented. Hilarious watching him trash his own lawyer who was standing right next to him though.

These people that work with him and expect anything but to absolutely get shit on should be ashamed of themselves. First, for working with a wannabe fascist dictator and all around POS. Second, for debasing themselves and allowing him to insult them all so readily, frequently, and publicly.

https://docs.flatpak.org/en/latest/hosting-a-repository.html

No, because your poll already said 30% of that same number is voting Harris, and Trump is only 10% because he is so disliked. Stein isn’t on the ballot in any of the deciding swing states, so again…does not matter. The Muslim population is not large enough to matter.

Almost as if she’s not thinking quite right.

Already exists, idiots. Adding five more ways to do the same thing is fucking pointless unless you’re trying to disenfranchise voters. If you ever want this to work, make passports free, and available solely by mail. Oh, that’s not possible? Neither is it for many people to go and get one.

Says who? The government certainly says they aren’t. Just because you may be related to them in some way doesn’t mean municipal programs and funds should exist for them. They aren’t even registered as refugee, alien, or asylum seekers if they are undocumented. Why should they be allowed to then receive help or funds from government run social programs in lieu of full citizens?

On either side of the political spectrum you have people that don’t want this. I’d like a better path for these people as well, but not in this way either. Regardless of taxpayer status, there are still laws, and the people this would benefit have intentionally disregarded those laws, and that shouldn’t be rewarded. Especially not in California when practically nobody except the highest earning families can afford permanent housing.

The circumstances of this people isn’t the problem though. It’s the fact that they are eligible at all that is the toxic component.

You’ll never be able to get enough public support behind anything like this when you know that there’s a large segment of voters crossing party lines who this pisses off. The root cause of citizenship is still the problem.

If you think that his is designed to make it harder for people, you’re mistaken. It should be working for citizens first. We can’t be making social policies that don’t already fix problems of the citizens, and then go a step further to include larger population segments. Our government shouldn’t be fixing everyone else’s problems when we can’t even help our own people.