In that case, I agree. There’s no sane reason for weed to be illegal in a country where alcohol is not.

What does this mean? Like, a 10 year old can walk into a grocery store and buy a tomato. Is that what you mean? Or did you mean legalize it like alcohol?

I could be wrong, but I’m pretty confident that you can’t use something with a lower standard of proof as evidence in a trial that requires a higher standard of proof. Civil cases only need to be proven by the standard “a preponderance of evidence”, whereas criminal trials are required to proven “beyond a reasonable doubt”.

It’s probably okay in the other direction, though.

I subscribed to releases! Good work so far!

It’s not a bad heuristic to predict Trump. From staring directly at a solar eclipse to continuing to defame a person immediately after losing a defamation case about that person, Trump will always seemingly take the worst possible action in any given scenario.

I think (and am deeply saddened by it) that many people would go just for the proximity to Trump, not because they care one way or the other about Giuliani.

My first playthrough was the same thing, but I think it’s because I picked her up so late in Act 1. I have no actual data but I think that if you don’t have a certain level of approval with her when you

you miss out on romancing her for the rest of the game. For my playthrough, I basically picked her up, and started progressing through her quest immediately, and already that the item needed to finish her act 1 storyline; I think that’s what locked me out. Again, I’m just speculating, though.

While it doesn’t automatically mean that Giuliani sees the money, Trump is apparently having a fundraiser dinner for him. So maybe he does have something on Trump, still.

I might be off base, but your comment has the feel of a “gotcha!”. Yeah, America certainly qualifies.

Edit: Perhaps work pointing out that I’m not the first person you replied to.

You can disable it to install stuff if you want.

Check out VanillaOS. I think it’s pretty neat. Their webpage doesn’t really get into the benefits as much as I think they should, but a very quick summary is that it leverages distrobox and some custom package manager to allow you to seamlessly install and run packages from other distros. It’s also kind of an immutable OS (but not really). It lets you pick which types of apps you want during the install (snaps, fltapak, AppImage, etc)

I am not super in the loop about why people are so against snaps, but I don’t like the centralized nature of them, and if that’s also the general concern, then flatpak should be fine, since it’s decentralized.

I saw a couple youtube videos about VanillaOS; I could certainly find you one of them if you want to know more.

It’s not rambling to point out you lied. Maybe you should go back and open that link I provided that you definitely haven’t opened yet.

No, hold up a second. I need to understand why you lied.

Did you even look at the link? It’s not one you cited.

Did you happen to read that article?

I don’t understand. Surely they have foods that are vegan besides bread and water, right? Like, some vegetable being served or something?

This guy? https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/17/us/politics/alan-dershowitz-trump.html

If he wins in court, which is very likely,

Show your work here, because none of the actual lawyers I’ve seen weigh in on this have come to that conclusion.

What does this look like in context? Not charging him for crimes? Not covering this extremely newsworthy event?

I was curious and it turns out that the FEC does have regulation regarding public debates.

The part that would be relevant doesn’t seem to apply, though:

c. Criteria for candidate selection.

For all debates, staging organization(s) must use pre-established objective criteria to determine which candidates may participate in a debate. For general election debates, staging organizations(s) shall not use nomination by a particular political party as the sole objective criterion to determine whether to include a candidate in a debate. For debates held prior to a primary election, caucus or convention, staging organizations may restrict candidate participation to candidates seeking the nomination of one party, and need not stage a debate for candidates seeking the nomination of any other political party or independent candidates.

So, I guess there is a law that could be potentionally sued over, but I don’t see how the RNC doesn’t fall within the guidelines. I’m not a lawyer.