Wow… It’s not easy trying not to misunderstand sentences…

it seems like it’s not the worst way to write text if I don’t want to allow an ai to parse my messages…

Oh… All this time i thought they were talking about “the internet”, trying to ask me the password to access my ISP’s IP routing tables! 😯

It makes so much sense now that i think about it… They were confused when i replied that i didn’t know what was the password to the internet!

As non-US person, we watched the Superbowl in anguish, fearing a win for SF would directly lead to a Trump win and a destruction of the current world order!

Here we go again… The web, which is what most people think about when saying “internet”, is an European invention.

So the low level stuff is American, but higher level stuff is European. But then again, were could claim that “web 2.0” was invented by American companies.

Internet is 70% American?

Bunyan sounds the same as some old French Canadian swear word, but is written differently. I think the real spelling would be something like “bon yenne”, and also resembles a French Canadian folklore named “Bon Jean”.

I don’t know a lot about DNA, but i know about facial recognition.

Facial recognition is highly inaccurate. It would be easy for people from the same country to “match” at facial recognition despite being totally unrelated.

If “face generation from DNA” is only roughly accurate (ex: nose size or skin tone), then anybody from the same ethnic origin could be a match. Basically, the more you look like the “average person”, the more likely you would fit the generated face.

Doesn’t it sound a lot like technology-enabled profiling?

I usually say “Yeah, i used to like IPA but i got bored of it. Do you have anything else than hoppy beers?” Then, they come up with the sours…

Google map is late to the game. NORAD has radars and has been doing it for much longer.

Due to the uncertainty principle, they can know where he’s going or where he is, but not both at the same time.

To be fair, sometimes it’s fucking complicated to find the correct HS code for some goods…

I don’t condone their action, but i totally understand 😂😂

On Lemmy, whenever I use the “back” feature of my cell phone web browser, the feed reverts to the default filter. It’s probably a bug, but it prevents ne from clicking without fear that I’ll lose where i was in my doomscrolling…

I think it’s set up this way so buyers can’t get back to Sony to ask for a free replacement if the media can’t be used anymore.

Let’s say you buy a disk that contains a movie. You din’t buy the right to watch that movie forever, because if the disk breaks, you need to buy a new copy.

However, we could argue that this is just a symptom of a short industry… If my backpack breaks, even after 10 years, the company will replace it free of charge!

They could try to compensate the imbalance by explicitly asking for the lesser represented classes in the data… It’s an idea, not quite bad but not quite good either because of the problems you mentioned.

Didn’t you know? This cloud provider offers lead-free, gluten-free computing services without antibiotics! Also it’s not tested on animals!

Yeah, I suppose my second sentence is somewhat diminitive… The article itself is more of a "dossier" than a single article, and gatekeeping discussions only for those who read the full article(s) kind of discourages discussions on the topic.

The first thing I wanted to convey is that they're trying to redefine something that already exists. Today I learned that "atheism" has such a loaded baggage to you and the article's authors that they're is a need for a new word!

Too me, that is quite the revelation: everything I read in the article is exactly what I understand to be "atheism"! I've known that in some places on the world, it can be worst to be atheist than to be of the "wrong" religion… I hope using "the none phenomena" will help these people be safer…

They're taking about atheists. That's it.

Edit: Basically, this is a click-bait title where they intentionally keep the title's meaning mysterious, like it's a new viral trend or something dangerous. They define:

These so-called “nones" — atheists, agnostics, or nothing in particular —

When the completed manuscript exceeded 600,000 words, Cerf asked Rand to make cuts, but backed off when she compared the idea to cutting the Bible.

Wow, I didn't know this author, and it seems I wasn't missing much.

We’re on Lemmy. We’re already winning!

aka: all my code