Mega donors don’t want anti fascist rhetoric because it cuts into the profit margins
Mega donors don’t want anti fascist rhetoric because it cuts into the profit margins
Trump isn’t the problem. His rhetoric is. Giving him a a figurehead position just hands him a megaphone to spout more of it.
Um no, laat year progressives were saying the same thing they are today, the Israelis have been bombing Palestine for over a year.
We differ on a salient point I think. You view progressives as radicals.
I don’t think what the progressive wing of the party are asking for is radical. Neither does the article I posted.
I need to get better at reading usernames
Oh, no. I was referencing the Overton window in general. Not voter turnout as a function of conservatism vs liberalism vs progressivism.
Here’s a quick article that will give some jumping off points for further research.
https://brockpress.com/the-overton-window-on-media-criticism-is-not-as-wide-as-it-needs-to-be/
This is my understanding of the problem as well. Moderate dems are selling the party to billionaires
Ah, sorry. I thought you were referring to election reform or presidential messaging. Yes, Dems in Congress have been a slight net positive.
It’s a well regarded theory in political science. It also is present in many other democracies, look at Germany or Sweden for a current example.
Buying power and income disparity are at the same levels they were 80-90 years ago.
https://www.vox.com/first-person/2019/4/1/18286084/gilded-age-income-inequality-robber-baron
Americans support “progressive” policy when it’s not framed as a political question.
https://time.com/6990721/us-politics-polarization-myth/
Lastly, you think Americans were more progressive on average 90 years ago?
Low voter turnout is a voter access and apathy issue. Disenfranchised voters tend to not vote and that’s a platform and outreach issue for the DNC. Low voter access is shit that elected dems should put first and foremost in their agenda once elected, but only Abrams and Sanders have talked about election reform since Carter was president.
They didn’t do much to stop it
And what have they done to stop it?
There’s a theory called the Overton Window and Dems moving to the center has shifted this whole country to the right. We lost abortion rights because of it and our election integrity and voter access is at risk because of it.
If you want to look at a winning strategy that directly refutes your point look at FDR.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overton_window
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidency_of_Franklin_D._Roosevelt,_third_and_fourth_terms
In my humble opinion the point of self hosting an LLM is so that the data doesn’t leave your LAN.
I’d encourage Johnson to recess in the affected areas then.
Yes, but what does the BLOB do?
I bought moon reader 7 years ago and still use it.
Money PLEEEEEAAAAASSSSSEEEEE
Hezbollah condemning attacks on the UN, that’s a new one for me. Israel is creating alliances that have never before existed.
I mean, they’re committing warcrimes to do it…which fucking sucks.
It’s always been nonsense. His supporters don’t watch him speak, and when they do, they tend to leave early. This is just enforcing the same feedback loop the media always has with Trump. Racists and Christo-Fascists will still vote for him.
People that don’t support his platform need to vote. The DNC needs to get their head out of their ass and start doing outreach to Muslim and Palestinian and progressive elements in Michigan and Pennsylvania. They need to roll out the vote in Georgia and start building the paperwork to defend against faithless electors. This could be Gore Bush 2000 all over again and I guarantee this Supreme Court will happily hand the presidency to Cheeto Mussolini.