FYI Hillary did not win the popular vote just because of California

Also you shouldn’t reward bad actors providing a shit place to live by making their vote count significantly more.

One citizen one vote!

Past his jailtime too.

Do better.

Edit: Suggesting not to regularly post right wing toilet paper gets a flood of downvotes?

If Döpfner/Springer are behind Politico it is fucking poison.

It’s a (very obvious) troll, that’s all.

I think the troll has been well fed for a while now.

OP is referring to this story:

https://jalopnik.com/heres-more-proof-tesla-faked-its-cybertruck-vs-porsche-1851481714

Yet another lie by Elon/Tesla.

I thought Elon is what you get when ordering Tony Stark from Wish but this is better.

Almost no one in your bubble/perception unfortunately. There are still lots of people that are only aware of him being a POS but still think he’s a genius.

It’s Porsche. Sorry to be that guy but that bothers me.

In the video they seem to refer to the 2nd Reich of 1871.

Which is cool because of they it so much they should adopt a couple of their policies. Like universal healthcare (1883).

I know they mean 1933 when they say 1871 but let’s still make this about healthcare and social security that were introduced in the ‘unified Reich’.

In their ignorance the Trump campaign delivered a nice own goal: if they love the 2nd Reich of 1871 so much they should adopt a couple of their policies.

Universal healthcare for example - introduced in 1883 by a conservative chancellor by the name of Bismarck.

Sorry, you’re completely utterly wrong here. First, the Reichs:

1. Reich: Holy Roman Empire (of the German Nation).
2. Reich: (Unified) German Empire (1871-1918). → that’s the one they were referring to by wording, but not by implication.
3. Reich: Nazi Germany (1933-1945). → context and implication should make it clear they mean this one.

The Weimar Republic took place between the second and the third Reich. It would’ve been a golden age of great prosperity if it weren’t for the Versailles contract and the Great Depression. It’s still had great economic achievements, which often get falsely attributed to Nazi Germany. You can be 100% sure that the Trump campaign doesn’t refer to this one. And please don’t conflate it with the 2nd Reich.

Even though the wording seems to indicate the 1871 German Reich the wording unified Reich and the use of the term Reich in English make this a Nazi Bullhorn.

Edit to add: In their ignorance the Trump campaign delivered a nice own goal: if they love the 2nd Reich of 1871 so much they should adopt a couple of their policies. Universal healthcare for example - introduced in 1883 by a conservative chancellor by the name of Bismarck.

It’s still important to call out the hypocrisy, even if it is their normal modus operandi. Ad nauseatum.

Liars and conmen need to be exposed again and again until the most misinformed and thickest victim finally gets it.

Trump has proven that this will take until the end of time but it is still worth it. If you save one victim per bunch of Trumpists it’s worth it.

& it already happened:

https://images.jpost.com/image/upload/f_auto,fl_lossy/t_JD_ArticleMainImageFaceDetect/472066

I’m an atheist and still find this blasphemous mockery of Christianity disturbing.

Even if it is typical it is still hypocritical.

When the horseshoe becomes a circle…

Sauer Kraut

The linked interview has one(!) offhand comment by Abram de Swaan about the alleged practise. The interview is in part to promote his book “The Killing Compartments: The Mentality of Mass Murder.” which of course features Nazi Germany quite a bit. So I went ahead and downloaded said book. The words ‘dog’, ‘puppy’ ,or ‘pet’ are mentioned zero times in the entirety of the book.

Trying to find the book and more sources for the allegation I came up with nothing else.

While “SS-Troops” (idiotic generalisation in this case) like the SS-Totenkopfverbände did many fucked up thinks and would be fucked up enough to feature the alleged dog killings in their training - there is so far no proof whatsoever.

If this were the case it would be in every other movie about WW2. It’s in Kingsmen FFS, where the good guys do this as part of their training.

Sorry, I have to call BS on this one.

The linked interview has one(!) offhand comment by Abram de Swaan about the alleged practise. The interview is in part to promote his book “The Killing Compartments: The Mentality of Mass Murder.” which of course features Nazi Germany quite a bit. So I went ahead and downloaded said book. The words ‘dog’, ‘puppy’ ,or ‘pet’ are mentioned zero times in the entirety of the book.

Trying to find the book and more sources for the allegation I came up with nothing else.

While “SS-Troops” (idiotic generalisation in this case) like the SS-Totenkopfverbände did many fucked up thinks and would be fucked up enough to feature the alleged dog killings in their training - there is so far no proof whatsoever.

If this were the case it would be in every other movie about WW2. It’s in Kingsmen FFS, where the good guys do this as part of their training.

Sorry, I have to call BS on this one.