hedidwot@lemmynsfw.comtoSelfhosted@lemmy.world•I spent ~$35 on new cables and my LAN speed increased 6xEnglish
25·
3 months agoHigh quality cat 5e would have done the job.
Original cables must have been faulty.
High quality cat 5e would have done the job.
Original cables must have been faulty.
I’m with the others recommending Brother. They aren’t perfect, but they’re the least bad.
Running about a 10 year old MFC 9349 CDW here, only changed the black toner so far. Used a cartridge reset truck I found on YouTube to get more life out of the original black before that.
Scans to network nicely, does 2 sided prints etc.
Go for a Brother.
I don’t know WTF your on about… But you’ve convinced me. Have my vote.
Yep. There was an assumption 20 years ago when common switches were 100Mbps and running cat5e that you’d have to upgrade cable to get the next speed tier, 1Gbps.
It propagated wildly, but was always incorrect. Cat5e was very much capable of gigabit Ethernet by design.
It was only beyond gig that you’d need cat6, and even then at short lengths 2.5/5/10Gbe has a good chance of working on cat5e anyway (but don’t do it).