I think you misunderstood me?
I’m not saying the article is bad or wrong. I’m taking exception to putting kiddie gloves in headlines.
Think about the people who only read this concisely while browsing headlines. The headline is completely ambiguous and easily reinforces the person’s heels beliefs instead of laying out the important part of where it comes from.
This is before the author and content even comes into play.
Yeah, I did. The author uses political violence as the term throughout. The problem here is not what the author means but that they’re not directly addressing it in clear terms.
You had to guess/ask whether I read the article because the headline makes the source of the political violence ambiguous.
you can bet that an author pointing out a rise on the other side of the political spectrum would not go for muddy terms. This headline seen by a right wing person would just be something they would not click and assume it’s reassuring their fox news world view by a different outlet.
It’s “right-wing terrorism” not political violence as if the whole spectrum is engaged in the same shenanigans.
Incompetent seems pretty spot on since it can’t even burn the trash.
HIPAA covers the spreading of medical information by anyone who’s not the patient themselves.
Not that unusual depending on the software. A lot of them honour the TTL literally.
One enterprise software I know that does it is VMware vcenter. I'm sure there's plenty of consumer software that retries excessively.
There’s a “hub” mode where your endpoint inside the network grants access to the whole network like a standard VPN server.