rayon

Linux Mint makes it very easy to install Nvidia drivers and Optimus. I have used it in the past on a laptop with a similar configuration. It's also quite robust, probably more than Garuda.

What's the problem with it? (legit question from non-silverblue user)

Just got a call from Rust HQ; they cancelled the project and are deleting all the articles talking about it

Note that this is an old article from 2 years ago and that GKI is already implemented in Android

Apart from text editors/IDEs I don't really see the use for it. I think it is not practical unless all your users are both power users and programmers, which basically boils down to developer tools.

I think most people (including myself) prefer a minimal desktop by default, and then proceed to install only the software they need. Nevertheless, it always surprises me when I log in to a system that doesn't have vim.

If you aren’t starting your container with the -it options (for docker run), try setting them so that it allocates a tty. The fact that it works with SSH however makes me think that perhaps the Synology task runner can’t run interactive commands like docker attach because it has no stdin. In that case you’ll need to do something like this: https://serverfault.com/questions/885765/how-to-send-text-to-stdin-of-docker-container/947763#947763 to pipe the stop command into the stdin of the bedrock server.

If you aren’t starting your container with the -it options, try setting it so that it allocates a tty. The fact that it works with SSH however makes me think that perhaps the Synology task runner can’t run interactive commands like docker attach because it has no stdin. In that case you’ll need to do something like this: https://serverfault.com/questions/885765/how-to-send-text-to-stdin-of-docker-container/947763#947763 to pipe the stop command into the stdin of the bedrock server.

Are you able to docker attach to the container?

Do you mean emulators such as the Android emulator that comes with Android Studio, or is the latter lacking features that other software on windows possess?

I basically agree with all the points you are making. Only scan downloads, email attachments and whatnot. Don’t try to play cat and mouse with sophisticated malware because that’s a waste of resources. I don’t think software like this exists?

Perhaps SELinux on desktop is the way to go as other posts are suggesting, although I heard that it has some usability problems and can break some programs.

You might be legitimately annoyed by the amount of free antivirus software on Windows that don’t offer good protection, on top of being filled with ads. But I don’t agree that scanning for malicious files and preventing dangerous commands (regardless of how good the implementation is) can be labelled as snake oil.

I don’t understand why we keep telling new users that it is useless to use an antivirus on Linux. For people with computer knowledge, sure. However more widespread Linux adoption will mean more casual users will start using it. Most of them don’t have the “common sense” that is often mentioned ; these users will eventually fall for scams that tell them to run programs attached in emails or random bash scripts from the internet. The possibility is small, but it’s not zero, so why not protect against it?