• 0 Posts
  • 34 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 17th, 2023

help-circle










  • I’m a stem teacher, and I work hard at trying to get more women into stem.

    1. More women reduce reduce the number of men but simply increase the number of subjects we teach.
    2. More women in stem creates normality and produces more women in stem. When we have open nights women telling women how cool and interesting the subject is excited them.
    3. It increases range and capacity, I have tasks that are designed to interest young men. As I started producing content that also interests women we got better and richer tasks.
    4. In my teaching area we moderate other teachers courses and every single teacher who whines about women in stem have boring single focused programs
    5. Men like courses with women. Especially if those women have similar interests

    The no opportunity for males to be exceptional is a dog whistle. Stem is still there for men. There are still high standards.

    The problem is a lack of men in teaching roles.

    Young men have few, sometimes no, men who act as role models…for example, I get comments from students who love the fact that I have a beard and they like that a teacher is proud to present in one.

    Secondly men and women have different skills socialized into them. Guys are better at exams and practical tasks while women are socialized to be better at communicating tasks. As men left education assessments moved from practicals and exams to essays.

    Socialized isn’t entirely correct it’s also a lack of focus on the difference between how young men and women develop in primary years which also leads to skill issues

    Anyway ranting on my phone sucks. More women in stem, especially in digital technology and engineering is great, women have ideas, they can solve problems, we should learn why engineering is a sausage festival instead of just assuming that it is because men are more exceptional at engineering than women.