And? My point still stands, a cow that hasn’t been impregnated will not produce milk. Is only doing it once supposed to make it better?
And? My point still stands, a cow that hasn’t been impregnated will not produce milk. Is only doing it once supposed to make it better?
Mammals need to be pregnant to produce milk, so to get cow milk you have to impregnate a cow. That’s what they mean by rapist.
Can’t believe they didn’t call it Stadium.
> Tango makes a great game
> Put it day one on Game Pass
> Close the studio when it doesn’t meet sale targets
Corp. logic truly is something else.
Lollypop, it’s a bit dated in terms of design for a GNOME app but it has all the features you could want. Can’t comment on playlists though, I have never used playlists and honestly don’t get the point of them.
Zoxide, lets you quickly jump to places in your filesystem. E.g. z pic
will put you in ~/Pictures
.
I’m not saying that these, or remakes generally, are bad(I’ve even been thinking of picking up the DS remake). I just don’t think they should be contenders for GOTY.
Why are two remakes on this? It’s not like this year has been short on good releases.
Damn, what are the odds?
Chrome, and browsers based on it, currently account for more than three quarters of web traffic. This gives Google a huge amount of power over the web and how people are able to interact with it. Google is also a company who’s primary business is advertising and surveillance; this means they have every incentive to curtail your ability to stop websites from spying on you and force you to use the web on their terms. They’re currently exercising this power with the rollout of Manifest V3, where they’re severely limiting the functionality of content blocking extensions like uBlock Origin.
Checking if the user is using Firefox is pretty easy:
CSS.supports('(-moz-user-input: none)') // only returns true in FF
GTK currently has a CSS extension that lets you define named colours with @define-color
.
Tablet, for whatever reason it gives blobby output like this:
It's main advantage, as far as I can tell, is having a much simpler interface. It's snapping tools are trivial to use and discover, but far less robust than Krita's assistant tool. It's easier to add brushes, but you have far less options in configuring them. I don't thinks there's anything that Firealpaca can do that's partially hard to do in Krita. Also, Firealpaca doesn't have a dark mode.
I'm not an experienced artist though, so take my opinion with a grain of salt.
Its brush engine is kinda bad though. You basically have to turn on "Zero pressure at both ends" and put the stabiliser up to like 15 to get anything usable. Not sure I can recommend it.
devs are begging
Do you mean beginning?
I'd assume it got removed because the title didn't include rule, but the modlogs just call you unhinged.
Thank god for reader view because this makes me feel physically sick to look at.
poast.org is run by neo Nazis?