The way that profiles works today is the reason I don’t use it. Chrome just handles it all so gracefully between profiles and opening links from other applications.
The way that profiles works today is the reason I don’t use it. Chrome just handles it all so gracefully between profiles and opening links from other applications.
I’m really sorry this happened to you.
I’m not going to share my credentials, but yes the explanation is reasonable. Any time that you attempt to reperfuse dead tissue, you’re setting yourself up for acute issues like yours, or hemorrhaging.
There’s a lot of factors in this that are unfortunate, but I think no matter the situation, the liver was on it’s way out, regardless of the diagnosis or reasoning.
It’s been in the Chrome extension for at least a year.
Michigan won’t be flying as high anymore on Ohioan’s dollars for marijuana, either!
This is where I think the flaw is in your system. You wouldn’t necessarily want to give your friends evul-friends@foo.com. Because once you start getting spam to it, you can’t nuke the email, because more then one person has it.
This is why one address per recipient or service makes the most sense. Not user defined, but completely random or maybe what the Fastmail automated emails do.
I suggest doing some market research before building your product/service so you are designing something that has the best fit for your consumer, and I think Fastmail handles things better than your service would right now, based upon what you’ve shared.
Fastmail offers this as well. I suggest looking into their offerings.
I think Fastmail already handles this gracefully, and has all the right integrations. Why should I use your service over Fastmail?
For example, the integration with Bitwarden can generate a new username for every site you go on.
I think to an attacker, your naming allows for identification of the pattern.
Also, 100% spam identification… nothing in the world is 100%. Unless you count the verification for someone to send you an email, which I don’t know if I consider spam identification.
I personally would never recommend someone to self host a password manager. There’s a lot of things that can go wrong, and any number of them could cause you to lose your passwords or at least access to them when you need them. There’s a lot of value in paying $10/yr for Bitwarden, to have a clear mind, and know that your information is safe, and accessible.
Watch at 2:00
https://youtu.be/7i3pjLqUQ1c?si=XMqDRI38qJOzQIpP