+1
I don’t think it shows any ads.
+1
I don’t think it shows any ads.
This phrasing
offsetting everything else your kidneys are filtering
sounds like a negative thing, at least how I’m reading it.
I know drinking too much water is bad, but was under the impression that drinking a lot of water is generally better for you.
I saw the post yesterday, but didn’t watch the video at the time.
Your comment convinced me to watch it, and, boy, was that more interesting than I expected.
One question remains: what are those gloves they are wearing? I get that it’s something that helps with the rolling technique, but is it just for abrasion/chafing prevention? Or does it do something else?
C#
If you’re drunk or stoned, it’s much better to order some delivery than to drive anywhere.
Obviously you could plan ahead to avoid this, but I would rather have gig apps than impaired drivers on the road.
I saved this recent comment, maybe it was somewhere in this thread?
wtf? When did it go down? I swear I was on it just a few months ago…
I recently read, and enjoyed, the Singularity Series by William Hertling. The first book is called Avogadro Corp.
It's certainly not going to win any prizes for amazing prose. And it's self-published, so the first two books could have definitely benefited from a professional editor (typos, etc). But if you're like me, and here for the interesting ideas and good understanding of tech, it's a fun little series.
Who is downvoting this??
I like how 3 of them, across almost 20 years, boil down to "learn Python". When's that dude gonna die??
deleted by creator
My favorite flavor as a kid!
This seems plausible to me.
They should make it smarter and group users based on their swipe technique and have a separate model for each group.
It does feel this way… but why?! Shouldn't it be getting better with more training data? Is other people's shitty typing data fucking up my experience?
Or maybe my swiping technique is getting lazy? I'm not sure, but it definitely feels worse than a few years ago.
But also the LAPD is much less likely to respond to crimes in poorer areas. So the numbers they report aren't all that meaningful.
You edited your comment after I replied
No reason to respect anyone who hasn't earned that respect. Age has nothing to do with it.
The title is a bit weird. On my first reading it makes it sound like two different people can have indistinguishable fingerprints. But after reading/skimming the article+paper, it seems like what they’ve actually done is been able to correlate fingerprints from different fingers on the same person.
So the title makes it sound like they’ve weakened the basis of fingerprinting as forensic evidence, when in fact they’ve developed a way to link the different fingerprints from the same criminal so that additional cases could be solved.
e.g. if a criminal only left a thumb print at one crime scene and an index finger print at another, this posed a problem for investigators because they couldn’t link them to the same person, but this “AI” approach can link those two different prints to the same person.