I think they meant that presidents should be forgettable and avoid damaging stuff
I think they meant that presidents should be forgettable and avoid damaging stuff
So let’s put pressure on our government to do that instead of trying to shoot ourselves in the foot.
It’ll be okay to vote third party (in a social sense since it’s already allowed legally) when we change the election systems that we use so that third party votes are not spoiler votes. Let’s abandon First Past the Post and use something like Ranked Choice Voting or better.
This does not say she is bragging about doing anything sexual with Trump. She is trying to deny it.
What is your opinion of the idea that this position may make you indistinguishable from a Trump supporter?
Almost! Kamarades. Kamalades?
Does celebate mean virgin? I thought it just meant not having sex.
Can’t it be fixed?
He’ll probably blame rigged elections for his loss. In his mind, he wants to avoid the idea he ever made a bad choice.
It seems like it is useful to try to speak to the median voter and (supposed) undecideds who would be affected by this. There are lots of other publications with different perspectives. Is it bad necessarily that this one exists and operates this way?
People often segregate themselves into bubbles separated from others they oppose. I can say since the political affiliation is known from past elections, that has become a stronger factor when I am deliberating on which places I would want to live. I’m sure this is adding to the polarization, where people are gravitating to communities that more often reinforce their beliefs and give them fewer opportunities to challenge them.
How can we counter this polarizing force?
Probably shouldn’t say that
There were a lot of rumors and speculation about this possibility last week that I think did take a lot of attention away from the Republican convention.
Then are you more aligned with the Republicans or the Democrats? Like it or not, the election system only supports two parties. That’s what we should be pushing towards changing rather than hurting ourselves.
The Democratic candidate is chosen at the convention, which hasn’t happened yet. What would a legal contest even be based on?
From the article you linked to:
Election law expert Richard Hasen wrote that there is “no credence” to the notion that the Democratic Party could not legally replace Biden on the ticket, as he is not the nominee yet – the nominating process generally takes place during the Democratic National Convention.
I hope you are happy helping the Republicans win
I think you are misunderstanding how the election system works. It is the Democrats vs Republicans and nothing else until a third party can get big enough to overtake one of the two and then it’s still just two major parties.
Save your energy for reforming the election system and then advocate for what you want. We have to be realistic here.
My take on the down votes is that it is dangerous to spread ideas about voting third party in a democracy with an election system that mechanically only supports two parties.
Even if you’re in a “safe” state, people from states that are more in the margins may hear the sentiment and want to participate out of principle. It makes the opposition more likely to win.
If we want the Democrats to win in the end, it’s safer to be pushing for engagement on all fronts. That’s what the Republicans are doing and they can actually be trusted to vote.
James Comey