![](https://discuss.online/pictrs/image/8db33aaf-1538-498d-953e-0f8b9357fc8d.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/q98XK4sKtw.png)
Yet curiously they’re far more secure. Huh.
Yet curiously they’re far more secure. Huh.
Checksums are not for authenticity, and link me to the docs that indicates that ostree’s optional encryption is enforced in flatpak
Apt or distro package manager of choice.
Wait till you learn that your flatpak client doesn’t verify anything it downloads
R? There’s nothing to read.
Wow, good news from google is rare
Assholes choose not to copyleft. Assholes choose NC licensees too
Making income from open licensing is the only ethical option, though.
You’re not a capitalist because you need to buy food
99% of people have some private keys they need to hide
Yes. And other people should be able to use other people’s work to make derivative works to feed themselves
I prefer more granular control. I appreciate “controversial” and “sort by date” and “top post for past week/month/year”
Didn’t California do a good GDPR copy?
No, not NC. People should be able to feed themselves for their work
It is a big deal! Its the difference between starving and not
And if you’re dead or incarcerated or otherwise uncontactable?
We shouldn’t throw humans under the bus just to thwart AI. This is not the way.
Why did I just read Google Drive
How far can you run PoE lines?
Many developers sign their AppImages, but its up to you to verify it