![](/static/23fb711/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/db7182d9-181a-45e1-b0aa-6768f144911a.jpeg)
Shame on you for not laundering the money through a book deal!
These are all me:
I control the following bots:
Shame on you for not laundering the money through a book deal!
(Unless you’re elected President, in which case, bully for you!)
That’s why they believe there was fraud - they have first-hand knowledge.
You’re not going to have voting under a republican, and that’s what you get if you don’t vote democrat.
This is a fundamental flaw with plurality voting. Fix that and we can talk about third parties.
Nah, the lead Lemmy developers and admins of Lemmy.ml are unapologetic communists and China supporters.
So what you are saying is that Donald J Trump is going to come to the rescue of the oppressed Muslim people of Palestine? The same Trump whose Middle East peace plan was formulated by his Jewish son-in-law and basically said “give Israel what they want, and everything will be fine”?
Gotcha.
“Hey dad, the WiFi in my dorm room keeps cutting out”
“Have you gotten your Ethernet hooked up yet?”
“Hey dad, when I try to stream TV, it keeps buffering”
“Have you gotten your Ethernet hooked up yet?”
Someday they’ll get it.
He’s a Senator - his district is the whole state.
Not that this negates anything you said, just clarifying.
Seems to me that your mistake is that you believe the purpose of polls is to predict an outcome, and/or tell you who is “winning” or “losing” at a given point in time. That is not their purpose.
Their purpose is to gauge the relative effectiveness of different campaign messaging strategies, and to give a rough order of magnitude of a campaign’s trajectory.
Here’s the most important part: polls contain no actionable data for voters. They shouldn’t influence whether or how much you volunteer or donate, and they absolutely must not influence how you vote.
Go into embedded software. You can’t do ads if there is no UI taps head.
Yeah, great. Give me my damn home office deduction back.
The court is limited to 9 by law. He’s need a majority in the house and eliminate the filibuster to change that.
Let’s remember that a bastard who married rich that had a good deal of influence on how our government works. He definitely was making sure that he had a future.
Yeah, I’ve been working in aerospace, automotive, industrial and rail safety for over 20 years. You don’t get to say “this software does thing” and then in the safety manual say “you don’t get to trust that the software will actually do thing”.
Further, when you claim the operator as a layer of protection in your safety system, the probability of dangerous failure is a function of the time between the fault (the software doing something stupid) and the failure (crash). The shorter that time, the less safe the system is.
Here’s a clue: Musk doesn’t know anything about software safety. Their lead in autonomous technology has less to do with technical innovation and more to do with cutting corners where they can get away with it.
Attempt? That was the original intent. They still wanted aristocracy, they just wanted it to be wealth based instead of hereditary.
Thank you! Even for someone technical, that needed an ELI5.
So, the software doesn’t actually do anything, it just gives the illusion that it does. That’s sounds safe.
If you are relying on T&C as a get out of jail free card for your safety system, then it isn’t a safety system.
It is a nice break from my day job, where I am certifying software for critical systems.
sigh
No one is leading or trailing, because no one has voted.
Polls are not even a little bit predictive this far out.
Polls contain no actionable data for voters unless they are looking days before the election and want to strategically vote in a race with more than 2 candidates.