Bold. Pescatarianism, but not vegan. Bold.
This space left intentionally blank.
Bold. Pescatarianism, but not vegan. Bold.
I, too, welcome our onlyfans overlords.
Why would Russia want our trouble makers? Lol.
Schism in my ass
Man in the Box in my ass.
For scale, I need to know how much is an “acceptable” amount…
This is where printf
debugging really shines, ironically.
For files, kebab case. For variables, snake case. For servers, megaman villains.
That is a downside, yes…
Pretend to be a girl well enough and he’ll send it to you.
They really did do a good job. The difference is that they have access to documentation about Linux that wine doesn’t have about Windows.
Yeah, I keep reading that as “Megaboners”
What if I am a giant 5 year old.
Gatekeeping enthusiasts
Could? Lol.
If only there were tampons in that bathroom, then it would be less weird.
Early 90s version of “The Game”
Because Wayland is fundamentally very different from the older X protocol, and many programs don’t even directly do X. They leverage libraries that do it for them. Those libraries are a huge part of the lag. Once GTK and Qt and the like start having a stable Wayland interface, you’ll see a huge influx of support.
A big part of the slowness is why Wayland is a thing to begin with. X hid a lot of the display hardware from apps. Things like accessing 3d hardware had to be done with specialized display clients. This was because X is natively a remote display tool. You can use X to have your program show its display somewhere else. Wayland won’t do that because that’s not the point. Applications that care will have goals for change. Applications don’t care will support it once someone else does it for them.
Right now, the only things that would benefit from Wayland are games and apps that make heavy use of certain types of hardware. Half of those don’t care about linux, while the other half is OK with X and xwayland.
I guess it loses something in the translation from the original Klingon…