“There were even cows on that list, though they were probably the result of scavenging rather than hunting.” I’d like to think that no, house cats took down a 2000 pound cow.

The worst part is specifically so the 30 year old doesn't go to jail. This is a legal loophole for adults to have sex with children.

Yes.

No one liked it. But I only watched it because of all the memes.

Like there had to be something at least worth making fun of. Nope. It just kinda sucked till I turned it off.

Morbius It wasn't bad enough to finish or good enough to enjoy. Never said it was Morbin time. It had Dr. Who so there was that.

Bowman did intentionally try to prevent the house from executing their duties while in session. Even worse it was at a critical moment.

That shockingly enough is the correct accusation from Trump. That IS what January 6th insurrectionists did. If this is actually as bad as it looks from the outside. He should receive a meaningful punishment.

True, but unions as an external force can simply state the exec total pay package rose by 25% in value. "pay us" The problem has been looking to the boards installed by investors to cut their own pay. My hope is boards will cool down on huge exec bonuses if it means they may have to do the same for workers.

Depending on what assets are covered under this ruling there would still be considerable finances even after the selloff. Each apartment in Trump towers alone go for the millions. Trump tower alone is likely worth more than even the asking damages, much less awarded.

This could be the start of something good. The 40% number isn't out of thin air. It is the amount the CEO got his pay raised to . Unions can tie exec raises to worker pay in a way that boards aren't doing.

Nope. Looks like I missed the line where the total funds are 35 million. 350k is enough to get a house and move an established family.

The government is revoking the business license, not stripping Trump of assets. Trump still owns the business, but the court is now in charge of winding them down. All of the money is still going to Trump and family while this happens. The businesses will get sold off and Trump will get the money for that as well.

People thinking like you will believe that the government is stealing Trumps properties, which it is not. He will be able to fund raise off of this.

When the pieces are sold off, other companies can buy the assets as long as they are in good standing. Trump has businesses in other states not covered by this ruling, which is specific to New York state.

where are you getting a home for less than 170k?

The business still functions and makes money. Trump gets paid , but isn't allowed to run it. If parts get sold they will be sold for market prices. I woudn't be surprised if Trump gets paid for the sale of his assets and fund raises to buy them back under a business from another state. He could make out really well from this.

That's not very much money at all to relocate people. This is maybe enough for 25 households.

I lumped all the Republicans into one basket but. I can't imagine McConnell doing the same kind of stunt. Even Vance wouldn't do that.

Everyone will live long enough to regret this. Matt Gates will show up in a thong and a gas mask to protest something and the votes won't be there to bring things back the old rules.

This is in a thread about a sect of Christianity. I am not aware of another religion that uses the word church. The dictionary definition is christian house of worship. Jewish Synagogue. Islamic Mosque. Hindu Temple. Norse Hof. Greek and Roman temples.

Talking about taxing churches is about a tax on Christian houses of worship. There is no Christian religious rule against it, which means that it would be a stretch for anyone to claim that the government is violating the first amendment.

Ever have a dog? You really love the dog and the dog is smart for a dog, but no matter how hard you train them they won’t really understand you. You can get them to follow a few rules , but after a certain point you can’t really train them much more.

People can’t even handle the few very basic messages that were already laid out.

The concepts of racism was quite different then as to now and was addressed. Basically the story of the 'Good Samaritan" needed to add the ‘good’ because Samaritans were discriminated against and though of as poorly as racists do today.

Homophobia is basically covered in a bunch of places where in general you are supposed to love and treat people well. Jesus gave MANY examples of directly treating people who were not in good social, or religious, graces with kindness,openness and compassion. Basically the worse someone is the more you have to try and show love. I’m not sure at all how basically the complete opposite is the practice. There is some epic level mental gymnastics to get there.

Now slavery, umm… yeah. God was like , here are some rules on how to treat your slaves. You know because that is a thing and should keep being one. I’m glad this one is opposite in practice.

It’s very inline with the church’s teaching to pay taxes.

Mark 12:17 Then Jesus said to them, “Give to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and give to God the things that are God’s.” The men were amazed at what Jesus said.

There is no religious conflict at all with taxing churches.