Especially if it’s a man being accussed

Fuck Rolling Stone though. I still have no respect for them after the UVA thing. (and to much lesser extent their recent 250 guitarists list) what a joke of a publication.

Both sides is legit because Clinton said deplorables and you defended it. Now Trump says vermin and you want it to be a big deal. It is literally the same thing and you don't care when it's your side but want everyone to get worked into a frenzy when it's the other guy.

It literally is both sides in this case though. I mean fuck Trump and he has a long laundry list of other stuff to legitimately complain about him for, but Clinton had the whole "deplorables" thing. You guys were all cool with that and defended her. Now he Trump does basically the same thing and you wanna make it a big deal. Pick a rule and stick to it. Stop changing them depending on how much you like the person breaking them.

Because liberal concern trolls don't give 2 fucks about being hypocrites. They kept talking about how Trumps wife was a pornstar a couple years ago too, because she's a former model that posed topless once or twice. Meanwhile they idealize and elevate actual pornstars and would scream if anyone insulted based on their profession.

Meanwhile here you guys writing and posting articles about your open disdain for men in the tech industry. I doubt any of these guys have ever done that about women.

No no, it's ok when I do it.

If you don't like make your own movie

No, not like that

But again, I see people speaking out when someone "body shames" that garbage and it happens to be a woman. When it's a man, I get accused of being a pedophile for pointing out the hypocrisy. Even if YOU specifically happen to be the one exception (which I don't concede you are) it's still a general behavior across sites like this, reddit, etc. People love to make rules for everyone else, but then hold themselves exempt to those exact same rules.

It’s funny, I only posted this comment to see the reaction. Specifically because several times recently I’ve seen things like we shouldn’t boob shame Lauren Boebert even though she’s a POS. Those comments were upvoted and got comments of agreement coming in. I’ve always experienced that these societal rules are only for people who are members of certain groups. If it’s someone you don’t like and is a white guy, anything is on the table. So I post this just to test. Thank you for confirming my suspicions in spectacular fashion.

It's funny, I only posted this comment to see the reaction. Specifically because several times recently I've seen things like we shouldn't boob shame Lauren Boebert even though she's a POS. Those comments were upvoted and got comments of agreement coming in. I've always experienced that these societal rules are only for people who are members of certain groups. If it's someone you don't like and is a white guy, anything is on the table. So I post this and you accuse me (falsely) of supporting pedophiles. Why the hypocrisy? Thank you for confirming my suspicions in spectacular fashion.

deleted by creator

No bodyshaming

This is not news. The guys is a shitbag for sure, but this particular thing …how did this even get published?

deleted by creator

So much victim blaming in this thread.

Maybe like 10+ years ago. Sounds to me like you must have been part of the problem if you didn’t see it.

Removed by mod

Spoken like a true redditor. Leave that mindless stupid `manhating bullshit behind there.

Wait. So you mean people will actually have to read articles now? This is actually kind of genius.

I would love this to be true, but when it comes down to it, I think most of that 63% will make payments as expected. This is just something they can tell a surveyor to make themselves feel better unfortunately.