yea considering its FOSS it was good enough compared to a lot of the other clients for me to move away from Symfonium

https://github.com/CappielloAntonio/tempo

Waterfox is a neat project, but is often slow to implement security patches from Firefox upstream.

Materialious doesn’t use remote fonts by default, only as a backup if local font loading fails. For some reason ublock in hard mode makes local font fail loading & remote font is used.

Materialious contains zero trackers. Believe this was a issue with ublock falsely flagging local fonts as trackers or something, someone else open a issue on the repo with a similar issue. Feel free to review the source code for any trackers.

Maybe with the Materialious frontend

https://github.com/WardPearce/Materialious

Cough cough might be a plug

Home page is the “popular” page what is pulled from Invidious’ API. Basically just the popular videos people have been watching on that instance.

I enjoy confusing people.

Thanks for your interested. Currently this is just a alternative frontend for Invidious. But I am open to integrating other services into Materialious.

https://github.com/WardPearce/paaster

Cough cough might be bias

no history log, but happy to take PRs

Might even include some free viruses!

capy.life creator here, incredible tool

Its considered a highly experimental feature, so enabling it could result in unknown issues or even security issues.

Also Firefox still lacks isolatedProcess https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1565196

I'd imagine Firefox would enable Fission by default if it was actually ready.

The amount of Firefox fanboys who will get mad at you for mentioning Android Firefox missing per-site process isolation. I've basically made the choice to not mention it anymore because I always get harassed whenever I do lol…

Firefox on desktop is awesome, Mobile should be avoided.

Thanks for mentioning this! Always wanted a foss material ui weather app

https://github.com/ente-io/auth

Per-site process isolation is a powerful security feature that seeks to limit exposure of a malicious website/script abusing a security vulnerability. Firefox calls per-site process isolation Fission and is enabled by default on desktop. Fission is not yet enabled by default on Android, and when manually enabled it results in a severely degraded/broken experience. Furthermore Firefox on Android does not take advantage of Android’s isolatedProcess flag for completely sandboxing application services.

Obviously Firefox has it own data isolation, but this doesn’t matter if someone can execute bad actiing code due to lack of process isolation.

As I said I not a fan of Brave (mostly because of the crypto stuff), calling it spyware you could say is hhmmmm “misinformation”. Yes security and privacy are different concepts but they are closely linked. If your browser fails to stop malicious code from being executed, you might find this impacts your privacy.

Matter of facts is, Android Firefox lacks site isolation. Yes you can enable a highly experimental version of site isolation what will break your browser (admitted by your source) and may even fail to isolate sites altogether. Android Firefox doesn’t use isolated processes, a functionality what can’t be enabled.

I’m not sure what your goal is with this discussion, but obviously you don’t have any regard for privacy or security. Your arguments over semantics are obviously in bad fair (and not even accurate to the original discussion).

To reiterate for the millionth time, feel free to use Firefox on Android, I’m avoiding using Firefox due to large security concerns. Once Mozilla finishes implementing site isolation and process isolation, I’ll be the 1st one to move off Brave and into Firefox.

But for your own future reference, actually source articles what support your statements. Otherwise don’t get upset when someone points that out.

Oohh I know what must be happening, the highly experimental features you’ve enabled on Android Firefox must of messed up the pages. Explains why you can’t read.

Enjoy using your insecure browser 😘

haha cope harder friend, by default Firefox lacks site isolation. Enabling it is highly experimental 🤣 Before linking something and claiming I’m spreading misinformation (quite a serious claim to me because i spend my days coding foss privacy focused software) read the entire article 1st and when someone points out your wrong, learn how to take a loss. Also Android Firefox doesn’t take advantage of Android isolated processes, what Android chrome based browser’s do