Free healthcare in that the prison doctor or nurse will refuse to diagnose him with anything until he’s on his death bed and then give him comfort release so they don’t have to take care of him?

I love this! Officially adapted into my head canon now.

“I hope you’re getting this all down.”

I think they’d prefer he not be killed…

Edited, I’m bad at typing. He was a racist who smashes a black man into the concrete

There are even dozens of Christian adoption and fostering agencies that will completely ignore any and all criminal histories if you are godly enough. In fact, being as hypocritical as possible seems to be a selling point for these agencies. If you preach God’s love but have smashed a racists face into the concrete and lost your job over it and then shot your dog in the street while your wife defrauds the public and scams vulnerable people to the point of being sued by the state of Texas then you are exactly who they are looking to foster.

Edit: apologies, my fat fingers bungled it: if you are a racist who smashes black people’s faces into the concrete

Canadian confirming that the angry party leaves the bed. Usually me because I need time to think it through, get pissy and maybe a little childish, get over being pissy and childish and then go talk about it once I’ve realized how I was probably wrong or have come up with a way that accurately describes how I was wronged and why that makes me angry or sad. My husband is also the type that needs to think it out before talking so it works, unfortunately his process is way slower than mine.

I don’t know if it is a healthy way of dealing but it works for both of us and neither of us had healthy examples of any relationship in our lives so we take what we can get

I see they know my ex husband before the additional 300 lbs.

Their current symbol looks like a painted over swastika, so I’m sure their future will continue be a painted over swastika.

Or “for the sake of Lemmy, don’t…” or something along those lines when you disagree with someone.

Isn’t proper discussion supposed to have disagreement? Was the point of Lemmy to create a centrist echo chamber? People should disagree sometimes, we have to be reminded to consider outside perspectives sometimes, even if we don’t like that perspective.