Allseer

bots in the chat

your only logic is blame someone else for being a murderer

it’s faar more reasonable to avoid resorting to sapping just to kidnap and attack civilians you don’t like

also jesus is a white name so…

quick use dev tools to delete

but why?

to each their own. i’m sorry you’re struggling with depression.

those water thieves

call me crazy but I find washing the dishes and vacuuming very therapeutic

lets see how they feel it about after thriller starts playing.

coalminers: just making money, making sure my children have no future

nice

thanks for the sauce. Its very enlightening.

it does trouble me to think that the creators of stable diffusion could be financially punished. Did they at least try to compensate the artists in anyway?

It “feels” as though it parallels consultation. These creatives are literally paid for their creations. If a software constructs a neural network to emulate intellectual property, does that count as consultation? Could/Should it apply to the software developers or individuals using the software?

From the technical side, I don’t understand how all the red flags aren’t already there. the source material was taken, and now any individual could acquire that exact material or anything “in the spirit of” that material through a single service. Is this a new way to pirate?

stable diffusion is a great opportunity for small businesses. especially in an increasingly anti-small business america (maybe that’s just california?) I’d hate for it become inaccessible to creators that would wield it properly.

as long as creatives retain the ability to sue the bad actors, i’m glad. I personally don’t need Open or whomever is directly responsible for stable diffusion and its training data to be punished.

i don’t know the specifics of the lawsuit but i imagine this would parallel piracy.

in a way you could say that Open has pirated software directly from multiple intellectual properties. Open has distributed software which emulates skills and knowledge. remember this is a tool, not an individual.

it looks like the Kuratas. isn’t this too dangerous to give to just anyone?

i think they had an idea, a good one, but then at the last moment realized that it was all too dangerous and expensive in practice.

then they tried doing some weird hybrid between “professional” wrestling and a documentary.

poor planning was the ultimate downfall. i had high hopes.

You’re humanizing the software too much. Comparing software to human behavior is just plain wrong. GPT can’t even reason properly yet. I can’t see this as anything other than a more advanced collage process.

Open used intellectual property without consent of the owners. Major fucked.

If ‘anybody’ does anything similar to tracing, copy&pasting or even sampling a fraction of another person’s imagery or written work, that anybody is violating copyright.

but glue is for tree is wood glue

just a put wood glue

i’m just glad the monkeys aren’t suffering anymore. With elon sugarcoating tesla autopilot and neuralink’s impact on monkey brains, how are we supposed to trust this man?