![](/static/23fb711/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/h1ChnLuBHr.png)
Publicly available does not mean free to use.
Publicly available does not mean free to use.
I just use pamac. Almost never have to use pacman directly, except if somehow something broke with pamac, which is rare.
So you're a piece of shit basically?
"I am not ignorant"
That would have been the less insulting explanation.
Fighting for a shit government full of crappy politicians is already a weird choice.
Going in other countries to kill random innocent people for the profit of said government is an even weirder one.
The amount of ignorance in this comment is impressive.
The con of one of then being "is a rootkit"
Brave is notoriously dubious at best, encouraging ads and cryptocurrencies. It doesn't have any advantages over a hardened Firefox (and I would say even a basic one), so using it doesn't really make sense.
Ah, what is not to love about using AI to "screen" for things, while people still don't understand what it is and are using it to abuse whatever they can in any way they can.
=> Big corps are the problem
The military is accused of following a "woke agenda". If they don't know what it means they cannot be following it.
Doesn't take a lot of brainpower to understand that.
Encryption is generally "open source" and that's what makes is strong. Security does not come from people not knowing how things work, but by having properly designed things that work whether people know how they work or not.
He ignored his employees saying that the device wasn't ready and forced them to try it on the animals
It cannot "work". Even if it succeeded technically speaking, you cannot expect such a device to be secure (as no device is, and certainly not one made by Musk).
Now computerised cars are already an increasing risk in giving new ways to commit murder without being caught, but if you directly put a security risk in your brain, I am pretty sure that many people will jump on the occasion.
Big or not, they talked about great games, and there are many incredible open source games, however not always very popular.
I mean, technically even games like morrowind could be called open source now, with Open Morrowind.
Tell me you have no clue about video games without telling me you have no clue about video games.
Let’s forget wine and praise valve then I guess.
Everyone is welcome to attack the consensus. You just need to be backed up by very strong evidence. That’s all.
The reason people today dismiss “dissidents” is not out of a politically correctness deciding what is acceptable and what is not, but because most dissidents are nothing more than populists, getting known out of a “buzz” and not out of any actual proof of anything. You might call them “scientific dissidents” but they’re nothing more than scammers or sect gurus, as the proper scientists that actually rely on proof do not need to go on TV shows or social media to convince the crowd. There are still some bad behaviour inside science, but most of those are never reaching the public. As long as it doesn’t reach a TV set, it is basically invisible, and the ones that reach them are rarely worth considering.
helloWorld : '{IO, Exception} () helloWorld _ = printLine "Hello World"
I wouldn’t call it friendly.