Too many men want a ‘hard world’ which produces ‘strong men’, which really means ‘a failing society which disenfranchises women and children’ so that ‘men can do what they want and say they deserve it because they worked so hard getting drunk together’.

I am all for giving women training and weapons so they can tell men to fuck off using language and also action, when necessary.

Yes. Seriously, those who believe that society exists to entrench power overwhelmingly think men > children, and that this dominion extends naturally, and that law is a servant of that natural dominion.

The commenter with the mis-spelled username? They’re not worth listening to.

In court: “It’s my constitutional right to be racist, sexist, and derogatory!”

Thanks for your concern, I’ll file it with the other times strangers have tried to insult me but have been terrible at it.

Because I’m speaking the English I learned as a child, and I wasn’t alive then.

P.S. this is one part of why I don’t respect human society. The fact that this is allowed is just sad. We live in a world where it’s perfectly acceptable to have hungry children at the same time as rich people purposefully making the world worse, presumably because they enjoy seeing poor children be hungry (“it’s their fault for not having better parents”).

“You see,” he said, “if we work together to make the world worse, it will make us happier.”

The crowd started clapping.

“Your wife won’t like it,” he shouted, “your children won’t like it, the future won’t like it.”

The crowd started hollering.

“We like it! Us! We’re assholes, and we want the world to be one giant toilet that we can shit in!”

The crowd went wild, collectively losing their minds.

Thank you for restating what I said, I appreciate it.

Yes, you can enjoy language by making it shit. I’ll be dead eventually, so I’ll stop caring.

How fast is that bird falling? I’ll physics that on my calculator.

Let’s history that, and see what you did yesterday.

Every person is presumed innocent until proven guilty in court.

No. I don’t need to take you to court to prove that you can’t spell ‘escape’ in your username, for example. It’s just an obvious fact.

You can’t reduce reality to legal issues and then the fact of having committed an unpleasant actions to legal outcomes. Israel could literally blow up courts which start proceedings in terms of international law against the country, for example, that wouldn’t alter the reality of the evidence against Israel.

If you hit me with your car and I die, and there are witness, you did wrong regardless of what the court says.

This guy could kidnap orphan babies to strap his car and crash it into a wall and ‘claim ignorance’ that what he did was unethical and/or illegal.

math that

I’m sad that you Englished that.

The issue is a lack of respect for Palestinians leading to crimes against them. The only solution is for Palestinians to be seen as living beings who deserve fair treatment. This means fighting the smaller battles as well. Note the ‘as well’, not ‘instead of’.

Stochastic terrorism is furthered every time the outgroup is treated as lesser. Every single one of those treatments has to be questioned to stop this. It is tiresome. It is never-ending. It is impossible. I don’t give a shit, because I live in a world where people are treated like shit ‘just because’ and fuck anyone who allows that to happen, but in a non-sexual way because those people don’t need attempt to train more children to think like them.

Yes. It’s rude, but not confusing.

Generative AI is already doing that. Tech is an extension of human activity, and as humans are observably machines for making their human world worse for each other, trust tech involves some level of harmful ignorance.

I think she should go to a donut shop.

It’s not for people interested in watches. It’s for people interested in seeing a large economy having a figurehead who is a complete fucking waste of space.