Ya, that’s how it goes.

Here it is

https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/msom.2020.0937

It says on average 7.6 following recalls get announced, so we might get a few more!

Porsche just recalled every Taycan as well for a brake hose that can leak.

Tesla, Ford and Porshe all back to back.

Someone, university or something looked into this once, and found that something like 70% of the time recalls happen in groups like this as OEMs wait for others to announce their recalls first as they take the bigger stock /media hit. Then anyone else who had one but hadn’t announced it yet jumps in and doesn’t suffer as much.

I feel like something like https://www.storj.io/ is on the path to what we would want/need?

There might be some additional requirements for a true CDN to ensure data is closer to where it’s needed and in as many regions as needed though with the right amount of bandwidth. The data gets stored all over the place, but that doesn’t mean its optimal. But they do seem to claim it’s faster on their website…

Edit: For those not wanting to click, TLDR is they use excess storage around the world and make it accessible anywhere, and safe from failures. People with excess storage can join the network if they have enough storage/bandwidth and pass some tests. Their API is S3 compatible.

I think this needs further clarification

They have a problem with their wives being able to divorce them on their own.

That’s nice to hear. Was worried they’d somehow stop that one too.

What ever happened to the loan forgiveness plan where all they were doing was correctly applying the law to loans that should have been legally forgiven already, but weren’t, due to bureaucracy?

God killed those baby’s, not humans, so it’s all good.

The major difference in the UAE is that the judicial system is victim based. Not DA based. Basically the government leaves you alone for most of these things except if a party to the “crime” on the books complains.

That’s interesting. Do you know roughly where the line gets drawn where the government would step in regardless of neither party complaining?

The last time was like a friggin spy movie

That’s fucking bonkers. Sorry you/she had to go through that.

Oh that’s kinda cool, I didn’t know. If that’s the case, it kinda seems like they’re on the path to it just being fully normalized if those clinics are allowed to operate. I wonder how long it’ll take to go from this change to the next change.

So they also have laws about if the mothers life is at risk.

Any word in if they’re more liberal on that as well where the Dr’s aren’t terrified of doing one for an ectopic pregnancy or other life threatening situations.

In some places in the US that’s not considered a threat to life until it’s actually threatening your life.

Ah my bad, you’re right.

Then you’ll probably get shanked if any of the other inmates find out you were sent there for CP.

Have the AI try to recreate existing CP already deemed to have serious value and then have all the prompts/variations leading up to the closest match as part of an exhibit.

Edit: I should add, don’t try this at home, they’ll still probably say it has no value and throw you in jail.

There has been yes, but it doesn’t mean it’s the right ruling law. The law varies on that by jurisdiction as well because it is a murky area.

Edit: in the USA it might not even be illegal unless there was intent to distribute

By the statute’s own terms, the law does not make all fictional child pornography illegal, only that found to be obscene or lacking in serious value. The mere possession of said images is not a violation of the law unless it can be proven that they were transmitted through a common carrier, such as the mail or the Internet, transported across state lines, or of an amount that showed intent to distribute.[

So local AI generating fictional material that is not distributed may be okay federally in the USA.

It’s actually not clear that viewing material leads that person to causing in person abuse

Providing non harmful ways to access the content may lead to less abuse as the content they seek no longer comes from abuse, reducing demand for abusive content.

That being said, this instance isn’t completely fabricated and given its further release is harmful as it it involves a real person and will have emotional impact.

This is the way

If that was the case betting against him would give very little return as it’d be seen as a sure thing.

Oh all bets are definitely off on the follow-up.

Not to the level the media would make it like this.

I mean, I did say they’re hypocrites. It’s up to you if you want to keep a hypocrite in office.

OP: I don’t care if they break the law as the law shouldn’t be the law - net 27 votes

Me: I also don’t care if they break the law as the law shouldn’t be the law - net -10 votes

Edit: As the vote discrepancy increases, its become clear that more people on Lemmy are paying for sex than using drugs. That’s not surprising.