• 0 Posts
  • 24 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 9th, 2023

help-circle


  • Muun@lemmy.worldtoAsklemmy@lemmy.mlParent to Moderate YouTube
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    My son’s only 8 so I have no personal experience parenting a tween/teen. So take that into consideration with my advice.

    How about the next time you’re watching with them, try this:

    "I was raised allowed to moderate my own content because I was trusted to be intelligent and wise enough to critically select what I watched or read and learn from the mistakes I made if I consumed something negatively influential. I have tried to extend this same trust to you, but the constant repetition of what you hear and your inability to form a cogent argument makes me feel like your YouTube viewing habits are teaching you to accept concepts at face-value simply because they are popular.

    If you will engage with me in a discussion on these videos, I’ll leave you alone and continue to trust you on this. However, if you continue to shrug and dismiss the conversation, I will have to consider blocking this content until you are ready to engage with me on a deeper level."

    I know modern parenting advice tells us to prefer reward over punishment so if there’s a reward strong enough to motivate them to engage, go with that. But if punishment is a greater motivator, I’d say damn the modern parenting advice.





  • Hello fellow introvert. I too have struggled with these dynamics in the past.

    Im introverted and have always enjoyed my solitude. Some people have complained that I don’t talk much, which is true, I don’t need to talk to feel good.

    but jesus christ, others outright avoid even eye contact with me like the plague, even though I kept greeting them for at least 2 more days.

    Sounds like you’ve met people similar to you. How would you prefer others handle you? I’m guessing it’s “ditch the small chat, and get to the point”. I’d say, treat these people like that. Focus all your conversations with them purely on the shared work and leave them alone otherwise.

    I confess neither do I know how to react when people are friendly when I’m talking to a coworker they like but the moment this coworker leaves, they turn to a mute.

    It’s likely that they have an established working relationship with the other person but not you and so they freeze up in a 1:1 scenario. Just continue to engage with them in group settings until you establish rapport.

    It’s also a bit funny: 2 coworkers that the first day had small but normal conversations with me now look elsewhere when they see me… and I give them back the same treatment. Childish and petty? extremely, but I ask you: what should I do?

    You don’t have to do much. Continue to be friendly with them and if they don’t reciprocate just engage with them on the work alone. If you need something from them, ditch the small talk, explain the problem clearly and explain what you need from them.

    I think you’re trying to take a one size fits all approach here. You need to adapt to each individual. For those who want to be friendly and chatty, hit them up and engage with them. Find them to be boring? You pretend to care, ask them a few follow-up questions (people love to talk about their interests) and then glance at your watch and say “ugh, I’m really sorry to interrupt, I’ve got to <attend this meeting>/<finish this report>/<insert whatever it is you have due here>”.




  • Muun@lemmy.worldtoProgramming@programming.dev...
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    I spent nearly 6-7 years developing control systems applications in LabVIEW. While I loved working in LabVIEW, I don’t wish LabVIEW was more popular, but I would love to see a graphical programming language take off. The dataflow paradigm is really interesting to work with.


  • I actually forked your code so I could customize the keyboard a little bit. I was impressed that I didn’t have any problems building the thing right away. Doesn’t always happen for me with open source projects.

    One thing that was driving me nuts was how sensitive the swipe gestures on the spacebar are. I guess my thumbs always do a slight swipe when I’m pressing space and it was moving the cursor position on me. I wiped out all of that code. If you’re taking suggestions, a way to disable swipe gestures on the spacebar would be a cool add. I’ll see if I can get together a PR for it as well and be a part of the solution.





  • What's intriguing about the discovery is that these objects appear to be moving in pairs. Astronomers are currently struggling to explain them.

    I always hate when science reporting does this. Astronomers are not struggling to explain them, they just don't have enough data to take a hypothesis to a theorem!

    The article even tells us possible explanations:

    One possibility is that these objects grew out of regions in the nebula where the density of material was insufficient to make fully fledged stars.

    Another possibility is that they were made around stars and were then kicked out into interstellar space through various interactions.

    "The ejection hypothesis is the favoured one at the moment," said Prof Mark McCaughrean.



  • You are giving me explicit consent, though, as payment for downloading a whitepaper.

    You don't understand the word "explicit" do you? Unless I check a box that says "please send me bullshit", I am not explicitly giving you consent to send me bullshit. You're also not giving me an option to pay for the whitepaper to avoid being sent bullshit.

    Or if you’ve been prospected, I have to maintain a reason for emailing you in the CRM, and I’d invite you to consider the ramifications of “businesses can’t contact other businesses.”

    The ramifications are that your shitty industry dies over night, and I'm okay with it.

    What if you need your windows cleaned? Or your fleet vehicles need to have their tires checked? Or you need a new warehouse to expand your business?

    Okay, now I've lost respect for you as a person. If I need any of that I'm going to ask my peers for references because I trust references way more than some jackass sending me the same e-mail 12 times over 6 weeks. If I can't get references, them I'm going to use a search engine. Did you forget that exists?

    You personally in your every day role may not want that, but businesses, in general, do.

    But for all your bragging about being able to drill down and locate very specific individuals, none of you drill down and search by "this person in particular NEVER responds positively to spam". So until you start doing that, I'm affected by your immoral practices and I get an opinion too, whether you like my opinion or not.

    I am emailing you about your job if you are in charge of expensive ($10MM+) software applications and are interested in downsizing your compute and storage costs. Are you those things? If you are a CDAO of a billion dollar company, you probably would like to consider the product I work for.

    We're having a conversation about your industry in general. Not whatever goalpost you move the conversation to.

    It's clear to me from this conversation that your industry is not able to morally justify themselves and instead of owning your shitty behavior you have convinced yourselves that you're doing people a service. You are not good people. :(

    Also, I did notice you conveniently ignoring my comments on sending 12 freaking e-mails. I'd love to see you justify that nonsense.