Let’s not forget he stole an election with the help of a corrupt Republican governor and the Supreme Court, either.
Let’s not forget he stole an election with the help of a corrupt Republican governor and the Supreme Court, either.
Good point. I’m so used to using unisex bathrooms at home…
Thanks, I guess. Shame I can’t compete in the olympics or read books to children any more though.
TIL I’m a transwoman.
This isn’t new. Reddit mods have been like this for a decade or more. And the admins let them get away with it because they get free labour from them.
I increasingly feel like religious indoctrination in childhood creates a kind of mental illness or disability by disrupting the development of critical thinking skills.
This is not accidental. Many religious scholars have talked about the need to “instruct” children when they’re very young - by the age of three or four.
There are other forms of MGM too. Fortunately most of them are rare these days. Castration, subincision, penectomy.
And then there’s intersex people. That are routinely subject to “corrective surgery” in infancy. As adults they tend to be firmly of the opinion they should have been left alone and that the surgeries were harmful.
IMO bodily integrity and autonomy is a fundamental human right that should be absolutely respected for every human being.
MMA
Mexican Martial Arts?
Cue every kid in Iowa telling teacher their pronouns are Fr/Fi/Fo/Fum for a laugh.
Don’t worry, the bigots who are backing him won’t let him forget.
Removed by mod
This isn’t even remotely ambiguous. The DoJ’s interpretation is correct.
The question isn’t really about the meaning of “and”; it’s about the syntactic structure of the whole section.
A defendant is eligible if they do NOT have (A and B and C). In other words, having any of A, B or C will disqualify them.
The law could have been written in a more readable fashion, for example:
the defendant—
- (A) does not have more than 4 criminal history points…;
- (B) does not have a prior 3-point offense…; and
- © does not have a prior 2-point violent offense…
But the meaning is the same either way. Amazing that this got to the Supreme Court.
It’s also entirely plausible that this is exactly what was intended when the law was written.
Bonus points if you use an LLM to generate said illegible nonsense.
Some older online games have pretty good latency tolerance because they were built in an era before broadband was widely available.
Vanilla World of Warcraft, for example, has a ‘spell batching’ mechanic that helps to equalise things somewhat. You’ll need to play on a private server though because Blizz changed spell batching in Classic.
Everyone knows what their end game really is.
Sure, relocate them into the new unified Israel-Palestine.
The whole point is to ‘normalise’ all the issues with Trump’s presidency so that the public just sees impeachment etc as a normal political process rather than a sign of something being seriously wrong.
I miss mid-90s IRC. That was far more social than any ‘social’ media I’ve experienced since.
The first person reaching $1B in personal wealth.
I still reckon we should all just refer to him as “Thirty Four”.