pewter

This doesn’t make sense. How could the “Abandon Harris” movement start late last year when Harris wasn’t even the candidate?

They are programmatically token predictors. It will never be “closer” to intelligence for that very reason. The broader question should be, “can a token predictor simulate intelligence?”

Point 1 is suspect too. Black people have no incentive to let people know they’re black on the fediverse.

Yeah, that pretty much aligns with what I thought. A comment downvoted to -122.

First part is true, but irrelevant since it’s a blue district like I tried to explain to the other dude. When I say blue, I mean she more than doubled her next closest opponent (the Republican candidate)'s votes. It would be a waste of AIPAC’s money from their perspective.

Second part sounds like fan fiction because the users on Lemmy I’ve interacted with don’t sound like people who want to see a solidly blue district turn red.

That’s a primary. Different places have primaries at different times.

Yeah it does, because in the general election, she’ll be the only Democrat. That’s the purpose of the primary.

She won her primary a couple months ago and she’s in a very blue district.

It was always bs, but people on the Internet like spreading lies. I saw some politician go on MSNBC and she brought it up too. It’s embarrassing if she believed it and spread it.

This isn’t projection. They’re not saying “fascists”.

This sounds like Rubberduck debugging.

Thanks for checking that. YouTube has been doing weird things if you click the share button at the wrong time.

Hopefully this works: https://youtu.be/g1_V_4sMoOg

If some people say person X was bullied and some people say a person X wasn’t bullied. I’ll probably believe person X was bullied.

If you say they were bullied (and you’re not a liar) you only had to have seen it happen once. If you say they weren’t bullied either you a) never saw it happen or b) you’re always watching and it didn’t happen

A) is possible because most people don’t see all bullying, but it’s an overbroad statement B) is functionally impossible.

I’m also more likely to believe he was bullied because of the actual video that was posted where a classmate was pulling on his pant legs when Crooks didn’t want them to.

EDIT: fixed the link, I hope

Jill Stein is in her 70s.

Maybe your app is displaying them differently, but when I looked the 3rd highest top-level comment wanted the guy to have better aim and it had 49 net upvotes

https://archive.is/uNswh

I’m archiving so you see the same layout I saw.

That hasn’t been my experience in any thread that I’ve seen.

I decided to look for examples of threads and most had neutral comments and some comments agreeing with my memory events.

This archived thread was the most blatant one I found.

That wouldn’t work because some housing is much more expensive than others. It might have more rooms. It might be better built. It might be newer. At least a 5% increase cap would scale with all of those things more appropriately.

This is a weird headline generally, but it’s even weirder given that a UK outlet wrote it.

In many states the party you’re registered with is public. Who you voted for is kept private. The fact that you voted can’t be kept private in any real way if you’re voting in person.

few of us expect Democrats to lose the popular vote

Anything is possible. Long before the debate, national polling for Biden has been significantly worse than he performed in 2020 and Clinton in 2016.