By levelized cost of just the energy. Taking into account energy storage at different renewable mixes makes it a little worse for intermittent source. All that to say, nuclear can still be useful and cheaper in some situations.
By levelized cost of just the energy. Taking into account energy storage at different renewable mixes makes it a little worse for intermittent source. All that to say, nuclear can still be useful and cheaper in some situations.
If you count the hours spent and developer pay, I’m sure it would. It’s just all donated by the contributors.
I didn’t know if debit cards do, but I think credit cards do, which is why they can offer rewards.
What auto industry is Canada protecting? I doubt they think China is subsidizing their EVs to half the cost otherwise.
Do upper management use BBJs? Or do they use smaller planes like embraers?
I’d sure hope so, but I don’t know if they actually care about the long term effects.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Per-_and_polyfluoroalkyl_substances
I guess Teflon is a PFAS. The list of things that use PFASs was very long, I wonder why they went after fire fighting gear early? I couldn’t find any information on an effective alternative. To get the same thermal protection with less effective chemicals would it need to be heavier?
Edit: I guess the firefighters union is lobbying for getting rid of them, so I’d hope there’d be other effective options available. https://www.iaff.org/pfas/
To be clear, you’re against Russia using conscription as well, right?
Why is invading into Russia not okay?
Is only the combination of drafting and going into another country that is unacceptable? Is Ukraine even using conscripts on that front?
The goal of the invasion into Russia (in my estimation) is to take territory to trade back to Russia in exchange for parts of Ukraine that Russia has captured. Do you think that’s not okay? Why?
Sorry, I don’t mean to say that it killed more people in every case. I agree there are could be cases where the outcome was certain, and maintaining strength for gorilla resistance and saving population centers was likely prudent.
I was primarily referring to appeasement, where countries in Europe, mostly England, gave the Nazis land to avoid war.
Going into Russia has been a huge tactical success for them, we will see if it’s a strategic success, but chances are looking good. Drafting people against their will is kinda the definition of a draft. I haven’t looked into the exceptions or lack thereof specifically though.
Do you have a problem with Ukraine invading Russia at all after Russia is trying to annihilate them as a country? Do you have a problem with their conscription policies? Or a problem with using conscripts in the attack into Russia? Or a combination of those three?
So would a one week domestic only draft be acceptable?
So than what makes conscription too far? Would non military mandatory government service be permissible? How long would that duration need to be in order to be unacceptable?
So if a country wrote conscription into their constitution it’d be fine?
They dictate what you do and don’t do. Taxes take a portion of your time as well since you need to work longer. I didn’t see how it’s categorically different. Just a difference of extent.
Russia’s invasion is totally unjustified.
I think starting a war is very rarely justified. The evil prevented by attacking would need to be much larger than the inherent evil of the war. That’s pretty close to Justinian just war theory, but I’d weight present known evils much more highly than theoretically reduced future evils to account for uncertainty. For example, I think an allied invasion into Nazi Europe was justified.
They force jury duty, taxes, traffic laws, and sometimes public service or jail time. Those are all forced labor.
Isn’t the guy at the zeroith table?