I disagree with the part where a single person gets to decide to follow a law or not because it opens up the other side doing the same thing.
That same gender affirming care could be through the post, in which case someone who disagrees could just not deliver it.
The law needs to apply evenly or what is a loophole to one is shenanigans to the other.
I’ve seen a lot of rulers that actually don’t have a mark at 0 and instead go right to the edge as 0. Typically they are worn down, being made of wood, so the accuracy of the first inch is dubious. To ensure the distance is correct, sliding the ruler down one unit is a good idea. So, my ruler starts at 0 but my measurements start at 1.
Now hold on mate, just listing facts is not the same as an endorsement of a conclusion. The same can be said about NOT listing facts. All the information available should be presented to allow for informed opinions.
The longest journeys all start with the first step.
Generally the person who recorded the music would have a performance copyright on that recording. This is often sold, licensed, or otherwise given to another group to distribute that recording such as through CDs or streaming. That same performance can also frequently be licensed for use in videos, commercials, public displays, etc.
If the campaign purchased a license from the distributor to play the recording at a public event, there really isn’t any consultation with the original artist. Hence, an artist’s music being used for something they do not agree with.
If they did not purchase a license, that’s when the lawyers are unleashed.
Nice try, but I have more than that now and don’t want to go down to either.
I think there’s a fun bit of linguistics there. If you say more unpopular it implies that both are unpopular and one is even more so. If you say less popular, it implies that they are both popular, but one is to a lesser degree.
Doctor delivering a black baby: “Well ain’t you just the cutest little fella!”
A timer goes off in the background.
“Get a job, n-!”
City streets Take me to work So I don’t Have to twerk For some money Sellin’ my body Living is not free Somebody help me.
I have no idea what you’re talking about, that’s my homemade kombucha. I was going to try it for the first time on the flight, but I guess that’s not happening now.
Someone’s certainly taking the L here.
I miss the rains down in Africa.
Such a beautiful idea; after a long, parched stretch of time where you aren’t sure if your water supply will last you long enough to survive, the sky opens up and the rains finally fall. Your saved!
What the heck does blessing the rains do? Extra damage against the undead?
So her lips can taste like cherry cola.
They are external ports for water cooling. They allow you to run the pipes to an exterior location, and I have never seen anyone use them ever. I would leave the rubber grommet as it generally looks nicer than the hole.
I disagree.
I agree with the first part. It was supposed to be a check and balance to government power and oppression. It gives people the power to fight back against injustice.
However, in the time of intercontinental missiles, planes, tanks, and remote operated drones, are a bunch of peasants with guns actually going to do anything if the government turned on its people? Does the “right to bear arms” not extend to other, non-gun weapons?
Toast ≠ bread?
You know, I was thinking T = (0P) + 40, but that implies that 0 people would still be able to play the song in 40 minutes and that doesn’t feel right.
Yours also implies that any number of negative people could play the song in the same amount of time, and that also feels correct.
Awesome, that game was quite fun in early access. I’ll have to install it again.