My voting disctrict in Omaha is megablue so it’ll be a tough fight for them to get it back.

You know that shit’s gonna peel like a boiled egg

Underlegislation leads to a bloated, extortionate upper crust that weilds disproportionate power over those who rely on said financial system. There is a balance, and the problem you outline is the lesser of the two extremes.

How’re the kids?

That’s what you’re hung up on? There’s a whole subgenre of sharks with tits.

Let’s take a page from Helldivers and call it “Managed Capitalism.” Surely far better than rootstock /s

Not to mention that if he is off of any 1 ballot and loses, he has ammunition for another Jan6. If he has a “fair shot” and loses, there is less plausibility and (hopefully) fewer followers in the repeat.

You neglect the versatility of our tabboo language, too!

Take English’s favorite swear: Fuck.

Fuck is:

• Noun - “You sick fuck.”
• Verb - “I’d fuck it.”
• Adjective - “A fucked-up situation.”
• Superlative - “Un-fucking-believable.”

It can be used to express:

• Joy - “Fuck yes!”
• Horror - “Oh fuck…”
• Sensuality - “Fuck me~”
• Resignation - “Fuck me…”
• Anger - “Fuck you!”
• Condolences - “That’s fucked…”

And that’s just scratching the surface!

Yeah… I wouldn’t enjoy it as much if it was “honey I shrunk my little bro.”

We have that one. It’s a tiny indie gem called No Man’s Sky, and, get this, there’s no cutscene when you leave the planet!

You’re absolutely correct, and we should fight to ensure that the law is presented equally to all charges. That doesn’t refute my point. This is the core foundation of British Common Law, that only a sure and clear conviction may be justly carried out. Any doubt leaves injustice as the outcome as sure as you claim it to be so for the poor. If we rewrite the rules or even disregard existing precident on the grounds that “well they wouldn’t be just if it was us at the noose,” then we are pushing for the type of system you (rightfully) claim to be unequally unjust.

I can tell you’re being facetious, but you’re 100% right. You do, indeed, need to give every benefit of the doubt in our legal process. That is what is meant by “innocent until proven guilty.” They must make it so there is no foothold for appeal. No “well you didn’t tell me…” or “you should have had a firm definition for…” No, if the legal system wants to take someone down, REALLY take them down, they must do it with every ounce of assurance and with no room for doubt that this person explicitly broke a law, in full knowledge and with warning, that they can be convicted to the full extent of said law.

That’s okay. I hear they do punch cards now. Only a matter of time.

Hyperfurs and macros are, too, generally niche, and micro cuddle piles are similarly wholesome <3

Gmap data is dated around sensitive sites and they have to request DoD clearance to update that type of sat imagery, and even then objects can be blurred or even photoshopped by the DoD before google is allowed to post the update, and by then any intel even unedited is OBE. It makes sense that a country would want their own, up-to-date system.

Thw books, obviously! Been decades tho

Su Cuy’Gar, Mando’an!

The word you're looking for is schadenfreude

That's Ruth, the HoA Fish

A Rose by any other name needs it's thorns clipped.