• 0 Posts
  • 16 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: August 22nd, 2023

help-circle







  • that's not the point. the point is that there are people who can't afford to save money in the long run. not like metaphorically can't afford, like literally mathematically cannot afford.

    they are trapped by their existing financial burdens which they already cannot meet and which are getting larger every month thanks to compound interest.

    inflation, which normally has the effect of reducing the value of debts over time, is instead making their financial burdens effectively larger too. as inflation drives up the cost of living, wages stay the same and they have ever less of their income available to make debt payments as a result.




  • Flambo@lemmy.worldtointernet funeral@lemmy.worldturbines
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    fwiw, chemical energy batteries (aka typical batteries) are also potential energy batteries.

    I don't know a simple or correct label that differentiates batteries whose potential energy is gravity-dependent from batteries whose potential energy is chemical-reaction-dependent, but the concept of gravity-based energy storage absolutely is cool as heck.




  • If the Republican party ever becomes irrelevant, Democrats will be stuck waiting to find out what their new opposition party will be. If it winds up being an actual progressive party, I don't really see what options Democrats would be left with. Either they try to gain support from people leaving the Republican party, or they try to be "progressive enough" without losing corporate support?

    If Democrats share that uncertainty about a post-Republican future, and if they think the way most status quo actors seem to, then I imagine they'd prefer the Republican party to hang on as long as possible.

    What I think that strategy would look like: Democrats going as fiscally conservative as they can while still remaining left of Republicans. Democrats lamenting their inability to make progressive changes, all the while not investing much more than lip service towards advancing said progressive changes.


  • Even if the arrest is unlawful, resisting arrest is clearly illegal.

    And the punishment for breaking any law is death? Or from your prior comment:

    They tried to stun him twice, use a baton, the only option left was to use the gun.

    Yeah, the gun was the only option. You definitely can't just let someone run away for resisting arrest at a traffic stop. Even if you impound their now-abandoned car, they might go on a whole spree of resisting arrests or something.

    In case you can't tell my tone is past sarcasm and well into disgust.




  • Then the school district told him he had to cut a key point from his presentation — that the artist he helped rescue from obscurity had a gay son. Rather than acquiesce, he canceled the last of his talks.

    “We’re long past the point where we should be policing people talking about who they love,” Nobleman said in a telephone interview. “And that’s what I’m hoping will happen in this community.”

    They didn't ask him not to "say 'gay'", as the title all but claims. They asked him to participate in the erasure of a relevant gay person from a story he was teaching to children.